Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=470696
--- Comment #100 from Brett Lentz <blentz(a)redhat.com> 2011-12-01 09:12:15 EST ---
I've got a couple patches that I'm pushing the Boost folks to merge. I'm
still
unravelling the stack trace exception patch into something workable.
Discussion on EINTR patch:
http://marc.info/?t=132269010900002&r=1&w=2\
Discussion on configurable stack size patch:
http://marc.info/?t=132266986500004&r=1&w=2
Hongli - If you have a moment to take a look at the discussion around your
EINTR modifications. According to the Boost folks, POSIX specifically forbids
pthreads from returning EINTR. You already mentioned that this happened on a
customer's system in production, do you recall what OS it was?
It might make that particular patch a bit more palatable if we can couch it in
some ifdefs, so that it's only necessary on the broken platform.
Additionally, it might allow us to file a bug with the upstream OS if the
behavior still exists.
--
Configure bugmail:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug.