https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1648728
Petr Viktorin <pviktori(a)redhat.com> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Flags|needinfo?(christof(a)damian.n |
|et) |
|needinfo?(tuanta@iwayvietna |
|m.com) |
|needinfo?(pviktori(a)redhat.c |
|om) |
--- Comment #20 from Petr Viktorin <pviktori(a)redhat.com> ---
Hello, and apologies for the delay.
If the progressbar and progressbar2 upstreams diverge, we'll be in quite a
tough spot. But for now, it seems progressbar2 is better maintained, and wants
to keep compatibility with the original.
So, let's replace python3-progressbar by python3-progressbar2.
The python2 package is going away soon though; let's keep that as it is.
Ankur, if it works for you, can you:
- post a heads-up to Fedora-devel, CCing maintainers of the dependent packages
and the other progressbar admins (tuanta, cdamian), saying what the plan is
- remove the python2-progressbar2 subpackage entirely from the spec (this
should simplify it quite a bit!)
- make python3-progressbar2 replace python3-progressbar (using versioned
Obsoletes & Provides)
- get it approved
- please, add me as a co-maintainer
- let me know so I can remove the python3-progressbar package
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component