https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1857767
--- Comment #11 from Fabian Affolter <mail(a)fabian-affolter.ch> ---
(In reply to Miro Hrončok from comment #7)
> It's a file.
Indeed. In that case, the setuptools BuildRequires is superfluous.
Removed
> Because this test is failing.
I figured that much ;) Is there an upstream report about this? (To be clear:
This is not a blocker for the review.)
It's on my todo list. But I need to investigate a little more before
complaining.
I've noticed the following files are packaged in python3-ephem:
/usr/lib64/python3.9/site-packages/ephem/doc
/usr/lib64/python3.9/site-packages/ephem/doc/CHANGELOG.rst
/usr/lib64/python3.9/site-packages/ephem/doc/angle.rst
/usr/lib64/python3.9/site-packages/ephem/doc/catalogs.rst
/usr/lib64/python3.9/site-packages/ephem/doc/coordinates.rst
/usr/lib64/python3.9/site-packages/ephem/doc/date.rst
/usr/lib64/python3.9/site-packages/ephem/doc/examples.rst
/usr/lib64/python3.9/site-packages/ephem/doc/index.rst
/usr/lib64/python3.9/site-packages/ephem/doc/newton.rst
/usr/lib64/python3.9/site-packages/ephem/doc/quick.rst
/usr/lib64/python3.9/site-packages/ephem/doc/radec.rst
/usr/lib64/python3.9/site-packages/ephem/doc/reference.rst
/usr/lib64/python3.9/site-packages/ephem/doc/rise-set.rst
/usr/lib64/python3.9/site-packages/ephem/doc/tutorial.rst
Are they used at runtime? If not, consider moving them to the doc package or
not packaging them at all.
They are removed as there is a doc subpackage which contain the rendered rst
file.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component