Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=632919
Mamoru Tasaka <mtasaka(a)ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
AssignedTo|nobody(a)fedoraproject.org |mtasaka(a)ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp
Flag| |fedora-review?
--- Comment #3 from Mamoru Tasaka <mtasaka(a)ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp> 2010-10-03 16:53:51
EDT ---
Almost okay.
* Explicit version specific dependency
- We usually don't write explicit version specific dependency
(like ">= 1.3.0" part on "Requires: rubygem(nokogiri)"
when all packages on currently supported Fedora (or EPEL) branches
statisfied such dependency because it is just redundant:
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/Guidelines#Explicit_Requires
* %doc in -doc subpackage
- %doc attribute in -doc subpackage is redundant because the name of
the rpm already indicates that the files in the rpm is for documentation.
--
Configure bugmail:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug.