https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1738290
--- Comment #17 from Peter Robinson <pbrobinson(a)gmail.com> ---
I wonder how we should proceed, if having a downstream patch to add a
.so
name
versioning as suggested in Comment #3 (and deal with any fallout caused by
the
API/ABI to change before they cut a versioned release) or just wait until
they
do that...
The problem we have with patching it downstream if we end up with a conflicting
versioning, or if we have to patch any app/library that may currently support
libcamera to support the versioned libraries.
I suppose the real question is what users outside of the libcamera included
utilities do we currently have to utilise libcamera? AKA what currently has
support for it?
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component