Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=751119
--- Comment #2 from Tomas Smetana <tsmetana(a)redhat.com> 2011-12-07 04:47:32 EST ---
Hello,
I tried to run rpmlint with the provided src.rpm:
perl-Judy.src: E: no-changelogname-tag
perl-Judy.src: W: invalid-license GPL
perl-Judy.src: W: no-url-tag
perl-Judy.src:21: W: unversioned-explicit-provides perl(Judy::1::_impl)
perl-Judy.src:21: W: unversioned-explicit-provides perl(Judy::1::_obj)
perl-Judy.src:21: W: unversioned-explicit-provides perl(Judy::1::_tie)
perl-Judy.src:22: W: unversioned-explicit-provides perl(Judy::L::_impl)
perl-Judy.src:22: W: unversioned-explicit-provides perl(Judy::L::_obj)
perl-Judy.src:22: W: unversioned-explicit-provides perl(Judy::L::_tie)
perl-Judy.src:23: W: unversioned-explicit-provides perl(Judy::SL::_impl)
perl-Judy.src:23: W: unversioned-explicit-provides perl(Judy::SL::_obj)
perl-Judy.src:23: W: unversioned-explicit-provides perl(Judy::SL::_tie)
perl-Judy.src:23: W: unversioned-explicit-provides perl(Judy::SL::_dump)
perl-Judy.src:24: W: unversioned-explicit-provides perl(Judy::HS::_impl)
perl-Judy.src:24: W: unversioned-explicit-provides perl(Judy::HS::_obj)
perl-Judy.src:24: W: unversioned-explicit-provides perl(Judy::HS::_tie)
perl-Judy.src:25: W: unversioned-explicit-provides perl(Judy::Mem::_impl)
perl-Judy.src:26: W: unversioned-explicit-provides perl(Judy::_tie)
perl-Judy.src:33: W: setup-not-quiet
perl-Judy.src:37: W: rpm-buildroot-usage %build perl Build.PL --install_path
arch=${RPM_BUILD_ROOT}/%{perl_sitearch} --install_path
libdoc=$RPM_BUILD_ROOT/%{_mandir}/man3
perl-Judy.src:50: W: macro-in-comment %{_name_version}
1 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 1 errors, 20 warnings
The missing changelog is definitely not OK. According to the README file the
license should be the same as Perl itself, which is "(GPL+ or Artistic) and
(GPLv2+ or Artistic) and Copyright Only and MIT and Public Domain and UCD"
however the Perl packaging guildelines [0] suggest "GPL+ or Artistic"...
I'm
lost.
As for the other warnings: the %clean version suggests the provided .spec is
not a final version(?). So it would be good to finalize it probably...
Since this is a Perl package I would rather someone more experienced to take a
look at it. However: there are errors that have to be corrected anyway.
[0]
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/Perl
--
Configure bugmail:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug.