Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.
Summary: Review Request: sepostgresql - Security-Enhanced PostgreSQL
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=249522
------- Additional Comments From tgl(a)redhat.com 2007-08-29 00:49 EST -------
Hmm ... if you changed HeapTupleHeader then it is pretty much completely unsafe to load
*any* standard
extension module into sepostgres; we have no way to tell which ones depend on that data
structure. But I
think all the PLs do, and many contrib modules do, so none of those RPMs are compatible
and you need to
supply substitutes.
I wonder if it'd be feasible to hide the sepostgres add-on data into the t_hoff
padding, the way OIDs have
been handled the last few releases? It's a bit of a long shot, but otherwise
we're going to have a real hard
time with binary dependencies.
--
Configure bugmail:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is.