Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.
Summary: Review Request: perl-Net-XMPP
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=191540
------- Additional Comments From cweyl(a)alumni.drew.edu 2006-05-15 10:37 EST -------
Updated:
Spec URL:
http://home.comcast.net/~ckweyl/perl-Net-XMPP.spec
SRPM URL:
http://home.comcast.net/~ckweyl/perl-Net-XMPP-1.0-2.fc5.src.rpm
Additionally, with respect to licensing, the author indicates that perl (GPL &
Artistic) is the correct license:
Date: Sun, 14 May 2006 16:52:31 -0500
From: Ryan Eatmon <reatmon(a)jabber.org>
To: Chris Weyl <cweyl(a)alumni.drew.edu>
Subject: Re: Net::XMPP license question
Yep.
Chris Weyl wrote:
Hey Ryan--
Quick question. I'm in the middle of packaging up Net::XMPP (and for
that matter, XML::Stream and Net::Jabber) for fedora extras, and it
was pointed out to me that while Net/XMPP.pm states "COPYRIGHT: This
module is free software, you can redistribute it and/or modify it
under the same terms as Perl itself", the actual archive includes a
LICENSE.LGPL.
Are all three of these modules under "the same terms as Perl itself"?
Thanks:)
--
Configure bugmail:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact.