https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1686506
--- Comment #16 from Jason A. Donenfeld <Jason(a)zx2c4.com> ---
- or keeping wireguard as a meta package
If you'd like to have a "wireguard" meta package, *in addition to the
wireguard-tools package*, that's totally fine with me. There might indeed at
some point be other things that get included in there. kmod(wireguard.ko) seems
like it'd make sense, for example.
We can do "Recommends: kmod(wireguard.ko)" until it is
mainlined, which will hopefully be soon.
@Jason, has there been any progress on getting WireGuard mainlined?
Yes, working on it!
From Joe:
You beat me to it. If you want someone to help co-maintain this
package, please let me know.
I'd actually strongly recommend adding Joe as a co-maintainer. He understands
the project extremely well, has been with us packaging it from the beginning,
and is pretty much an ideal maintainer. We've got a good working relationship,
so as weird quirks upstream come up, I'm pretty confident Joe can roll with
doing the right thing on the packaging side.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component