https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2007918
Jakub Kadlčík <jkadlcik(a)redhat.com> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Flags|needinfo?(jkadlcik(a)redhat.c |
|om) |
--- Comment #5 from Jakub Kadlčík <jkadlcik(a)redhat.com> ---
Thank you for pinging me, I forgot.
# Check for EPEL Python (python34, python36)
%if 0%{?python3_pkgversion}
BuildRequires: python%{python3_pkgversion}-devel
%else
BuildRequires: python3-devel
I've never seen this before. Is there any motivation for it? IMHO simply
BuildRequires: python3-devel
is good enough.
that essentially creates and initialises the tuptime DB with its
first entry. Doing it here ensures that the permissions, etc, are
controlled, rather than being in a more random state.
Can you please put that as a comment in the spec file? I think it will
be useful for whoever is going to read that spec file in the future.
%systemd_user_preun tuptime.service
I would expect %systemd_preun since there is %systemd_post in the
%post section.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2007918