Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=519051
Jeff Johnston <jjohnstn(a)redhat.com> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
CC| |jjohnstn(a)redhat.com
AssignedTo|nobody(a)fedoraproject.org |jjohnstn(a)redhat.com
Flag| |needinfo?(overholt(a)redhat.c
| |om)
--- Comment #1 from Jeff Johnston <jjohnstn(a)redhat.com> 2009-08-24 15:25:32 EDT
---
Review Comments:
1. There is a BSD license at the top of the spec. Should the licensing
add "and BSD"?
2. The description for the javadoc sub-package should be:
This package contains the API documentation for %{name}.
The template has its group as Development/Documentation, not Documentation.
3. The Java packaging guidelines state that there should be:
Requires: jpackage-utils
4. The following sections from the maven template of the Java
guidelines are missing.
%post
%update_maven_depmap
%postun
%update_maven_depmap
--
Configure bugmail:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug.