https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=736717
--- Comment #33 from Dennis van Dok <dennisvd(a)nikhef.nl> ---
(In reply to Orion Poplawski from comment #32)
The libdl dep should be handled like other library dep - a true/false
macro
should be added to the AC_CHECK_LIB() call (see the call for crypto a little
below) to set a DL_LIBS variable which would only be added to those link
lines that need it.
The next release will address this issue.
Although I'm not seeing any more unused lib dep rpmlint
messages myself on F20, so I'm not sure it is necessary.
Perhaps the --as-needed did the trick after all? I'm running fedora-review on
f19, I'm not sure I should expect the same results.
FWIW - If you still want to target EPEL5, you'll need BuildRoot
and %clean.
If not, I would drop the conditionals for %{rhel}<=5.
Yes, we do aim for EPEL5. So I'll fix this.
Finally - are you *sure* you want to keep the -devel packages as
noarch?
No, are the -devel packages noarch now? The only thing I see is that they have
a requires on some packages without %{?_isa}; is that harmful?
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are always notified about changes to this product and component