Product: Fedora
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=894338
--- Comment #9 from Ramon de C Valle <rcvalle(a)redhat.com> ---
(In reply to comment #8)
> And even before I updated it, none of the resulting packages
were empty.
You still misunderstand it then.
Or maybe you're contradicting yourself or not
being clear enough.
> Just type "A".
Interactive builds are not acceptable.
Quoting myself from the previous comment:
"...it doesn't happen for the "silently" updated Spec file anymore
because I
added the lines for removing the unpacked sources from previous builds, if
any."
> Can you enumerate which "weird" things I do on prep?
1) not starting in a clean/empty builddir
2) not building in a %{name}-%{version} namespace dir like thousands of
other packages
3) unzipping the source manually instead of using %setup for that
4) waiting for keyboard input because of 1)
For 1 and 4 see my above answer, for 2
and 3, see below.
> Btw, are you planning helping with anything?
Depends on whether you are willing to learn. At least you've started asking
questions. That's good. I would use this %prep section, which solves all the
problems in your one:
%prep
%setup -q -c %{name}-%{version}
%setup -q -n %{name}-%{version}/distorm3/make/linux -D -T
It seems redundant and
also unnecessarily uses the %setup macro twice. Why is
it better than:
rm -fr %{_builddir}/distorm3
unzip %{SOURCE0}
%setup -q -n distorm3/make/linux -D -T
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
Unsubscribe from this bug
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/token.cgi?t=ZQsuBc5rur&a=cc_unsubscribe