https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1416705
Petr Viktorin pviktori@redhat.com changed:
What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Blocks| |182235 (FE-Legal)
--- Comment #7 from Petr Viktorin pviktori@redhat.com --- Remove the CC-BY-NC files, and let upstream know that these files aren't [Free Content], which is complicating distribution of all of Kivy.
[Free Content]: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Free_content
I am not sure if removing them can be done by simply not including them in the built RPMs, or if you need to remove them from the SRPM as well, as described here: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging:SourceURL#When_Upstream_uses_Prohib...
Since I'm not sure, I made the bug block FE-Legal to get someone from the Legal team to clarify.
The section I linked above says "Some upstream packages include patents or trademarks that we are not allowed to ship even as source code," so maybe "Non-Commercial" licenced code is OK to ship in SRPMs? But that reading doesn't sound right -- are there no *licence* restrictions on SRPMs? I couldn't find much in the various guidelines. If there are, I believe the "When Upstream uses Prohibited Code" paragraph should mention/link to them.
Referenced Bugs:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=182235 [Bug 182235] Fedora Legal Tracker