https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1196780
--- Comment #2 from Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek <zbyszek(a)in.waw.pl> ---
fedora-review has the following to say:
- Permissions on files are set properly.
Note: See rpmlint output
See:
http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/Guidelines#FilePermissions
- Sources used to build the package match the upstream source, as provided
in the spec URL.
Note: Upstream MD5sum check error, diff is in
/var/tmp/1196780-openrpt/diff.txt
See:
http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/SourceURL
- Package uses either %{buildroot} or $RPM_BUILD_ROOT
Note: Using both %{buildroot} and $RPM_BUILD_ROOT
See:
http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/Guidelines#macros
- Spec file according to URL is the same as in SRPM.
Note: Spec file as given by url is not the same as in SRPM (see
attached diff).
See: (this test has no URL)
openrpt-devel.x86_64: W: spurious-executable-perm /usr/include/openrpt/**.h
openrpt-devel.x86_64: E: wrong-script-end-of-line-encoding
/usr/include/openrpt/OpenRPT/wrtembed/tmp/ui_texteditor.h
openrpt-devel.x86_64: E: wrong-script-end-of-line-encoding
/usr/include/openrpt/OpenRPT/wrtembed/tmp/ui_crosstabeditor.h
openrpt.src:47: W: macro-in-comment %{buildroot}
openrpt.src: W: file-size-mismatch v3.3.7.tar.gz = 1218978,
https://github.com/xtuple/openrpt/archive/v3.3.7.tar.gz = 1198328
openrpt-libs.x86_64: W: unused-direct-shlib-dependency
/usr/lib64/libopenrptcommon.so.1.0.0 /lib64/libpthread.so.0
openrpt-libs.x86_64: W: unused-direct-shlib-dependency
/usr/lib64/libopenrptcommon.so.1.0.0 /lib64/libm.so.6
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component