Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=567086
--- Comment #27 from Ankur Sinha <sanjay.ankur(a)gmail.com> 2011-06-16 04:42:49 EDT
---
Hi Peter,
(In reply to comment #25)
Hello!
(In reply to comment #24)
> Hello,
>
> An informal review :D
Ankur, please, reassign this ticket to yourself - I don;t have free time to
compolete the review in the next week or two.
I'll do that :)
Thanks,
(In reply to comment #26)
Hi all!
@Ankur: thanks a lot for your input!
I'll review klt and agree that the other libs should stay bundled.
I'm not familiar with the "final provides and requires are sane:" and
"review-req-check" parts. What exactly should I do here?
Hi Mario,
You need to just look at the list and see if the requires and provides are what
they should be ;)
review-req-check is just an alias:
alias review-req-check='for i in *rpm; do echo "== $i =="; echo
"Provides:";
rpm -qp --provides $i | sed "/rpmlib.*/d" ; echo ; echo "Requires:"
; rpm
-qp --requires $i | sed "/rpmlib.*/d"; echo; done'$
@Peter: ok thank you for bringing me so far :)
Best,
Mario
Thanks for taking klt Mario,
Thanks
Ankur
--
Configure bugmail:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug.