https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1131284
--- Comment #4 from Kalev Lember <kalevlember(a)gmail.com> ---
Yes, the naming here is not ideal. tpopela discussed different naming options
with upstream last week and they advised us to go with webkitgtk4:
11:40 <tpopela> <KaL> in webkitgtk3, 3 is not for gtk, but the wk binary
version
11:40 <tpopela> <KaL> so I would use webkitgtk4
11:40 <tpopela> <KaL> don't use webkit2gtk4 for the name of the package
11:41 <tpopela> so we should really go for webkitgtk4
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component