24 Aug
2016
24 Aug
'16
4:26 p.m.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1295115
--- Comment #27 from Dave Johansen davejohansen@gmail.com --- (In reply to jeremy.fergason from comment #26)
The one fly in the ointment is the conflict with LLDB. I see no good way around this. If we rename the swift version of lldb it will be confusing to users as all the swift documentation just says type lldb. If we don't rename it then there is a conflict with the lldb package.
My personal opinion is that having the "official" lldb binary left as is should take precendence over catering to Swift's documentation.
The Fedora policy seems to indicate the same general feeling: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging:Conflicts#Binary_Name_Conflicts
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component