https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=755510
--- Comment #73 from Jeff Peeler jpeeler@redhat.com --- Sorry about the silence here. Your package reviews seem good and I think you've learned a little more about what the expectations are for Fedora in doing them. This bug properly has FE-NEEDSPONSOR set (I can't sponsor), so if you don't hear anything in a few days (since this comment will produce an email) I'd reach out to the fedora development list. I believe that all that's required is for a sponsor to approve your review and then an scm request can be done.