https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1824156
--- Comment #14 from Simone Caronni <negativo17(a)gmail.com> ---
(In reply to Eric Sandeen from comment #12)
btw exfat-utils has now been renamed exfatprogs as of v1.0.2:
===
This is the second release of exfatprogs since the initial version(1.0.1).
We have received various feedbacks and patches since the previous release
and applied them in this release. Thanks for feedback and patches!
According to Goldwyn's comments, We renamed the project name from
exfat-utils to exfatprogs. However, There is an opinion that just renaming
the name is not enough. Because the binary names(mkfs.exfat, fsck.exfat)
still are same with ones in current exfat-utils RPM package.
===
I'll probably chime in on that thread, I think keeping the binary names is
the only way to go, but a conflicts: tag in packaging might be wise?
-Eric
As you wish, but then in the end the conflict in the package is the same as the
conflict in the files. I would still favour obsoleting/provides exfat-utils.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component