--- Comment #16 from Eric Smith <eric(a)brouhaha.com> ---
Thanks Harvey! I'm definitely interested in packaging a version of Java3D with
the licensing problem resolved. I'll look at the code at your links.
My primary interest in packaging Java3D was to support some 3D-printing related
applications, and I think using jogl2 as the back end should be perfectly fine
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
Unsubscribe from this bug