https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1832562
Michael Schwendt <bugs.michael(a)gmx.net> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
CC| |bugs.michael(a)gmx.net
--- Comment #6 from Michael Schwendt <bugs.michael(a)gmx.net> ---
This review request is a bit of a mystery. The spec file contains a few grave
mistakes that have been introduced since the older version found at:
https://pagure.io/tpcclib/blob/master/f/tpcclib.spec
%package devel
Summary: Libraries files for tpcclib development
# Upstream only provides static libraries
Provides: %{name}-static%{?_isa} = %{version}-static
Carefully follow
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/packaging-guidelines/#_packaging_sta...
since right now you would be unable to "BuildRequires: tpcclib-static" as per
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/packaging-guidelines/#_statically_li...
Also notice these two:
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/packaging-guidelines/#_requiring_bas...
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/packaging-guidelines/LicensingGuidel...
%files devel
%{_includedir}/*.a
%{_includedir}/*.h
Static libraries belong into %{_libdir}
Currently, there are 34 static libraries and 34 header files. Can you tell a
bit more about the usage scenario of this package? What external software does
(or will) use these libs? Each of the header files includes a missing
"tpcclibConfig.h" which indicates that these likely are internal headers and
libs and not a public API.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component