https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1788327
--- Comment #8 from Raphael Groner <projects.rg(a)smart.ms> ---
(In reply to Nicolas Chauvet (kwizart) from comment #6)
There is an issue if you have a package that will provides
libGL.so.1.
True. Maybe rename this file and let clients explicitly link to the other
library name?
…
Best would be to port this application to libglvnd so it don't
have to
override libGL.so.1
Can you please guide me how to do?
For information, which use case is behind this package ? I guess you
will
rely on a proprietary GLES implementation that lacks libGL.so (like some arm
devices)?
Please read the full context, a possible use case is box86, see comment #3 and
depending bug for another review request (but still as placeholder, will
continue that there when this here is approved).
I wonder if this package shouldn't be best in a copr
repository...
Why? NO doubt, copr is a general useful tool but I'd like to see a package in
official repository.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component