--- Comment #30 from Tim Fenn <tim.fenn(a)gmail.com> ---
(In reply to Antonio Trande from comment #29)
(In reply to Tim Fenn from comment #28)
> (In reply to Antonio Trande from comment #27)
> > Created attachment 1221971 [details]
> > review log
> > Package Review
> > ==============
> > Legend:
> > [x] = Pass, [!] = Fail, [-] = Not applicable, [?] = Not evaluated
> > [ ] = Manual review needed
> > Issues:
> > =======
> > - ----> sed -i -e 's! -shared ! -Wl,--as-needed\0!g' libtool
> > This commands does not work.
> > Try to set LDFLAGS="$RPM_LD_FLAGS -Wl,--as-needed"
> Can't get this to work - part of the problem is many of these dependencies
> are pulled in using pkg-config, so there isn't a simple solution that I can
> think of/come up with. Any suggestions?
Talking with upstream folks?
Yes - they are aware of the issue and working on it (although given the way
pkgconfig works, it may not be a straightforward fix?).
I would imagine other fedora packages use this mechanism to remove
unused-direct-shlib issues - is there a more general way to resolve this?
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component