Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.
Summary: Review Request: xgalaga - Galaga clone for X11
------- Additional Comments From j.w.r.degoede(a)hhs.nl 2006-05-23 03:59 EST -------
Chris and I had a private discussion about this by email because BZ was down,
copy and pasting it here for future reference:
Bugzilla is down so I'm doing it this way. Thanks for the review.
About the missing BR I failed to add that its needed for the devel branch too,
things just worked on my system because I already had the needed devel-package
About the name, I wans't sure about this myself, so now I've changed the name to
xgalaxy (googled, not taken already).
New SRPM and spec are at:
Christopher Stone wrote:
okay ill take a look at this tomorrow, been really busy today and
didnt get the chance to look at it.
Do you think the name is going to be a problem? I'd prefer xgalaga,
but then again, it's probably better to be safe than sorry.
The name is most likely not a problem, because the people with the rights to the
original name probably don't care. xgalaga has existed under this name for a
long time without trouble.
Then again the name had both me and you worried and those are valid worries the
name is a legal problem. Even if the other party _probably_ doesn't care it
still is a legal issue. It is the _probably_ that scares me and untill the "upto
now" part of upto now this hasn't been a problem. If the people with the rights
to the name one day all of a sudden do start caring, or get a grudge against OSS
we've a problem, which I would rather avoid. Since I've already done the hard
work of renaming (and recreating the "logo") I think its best / safest to stick
with the new name.
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact.