Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=573917
Ruediger Landmann <r.landmann(a)redhat.com> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
Blocks| |182235(FE-Legal)
AssignedTo|nobody(a)fedoraproject.org |r.landmann(a)redhat.com
Flag| |fedora-review?
--- Comment #5 from Ruediger Landmann <r.landmann(a)redhat.com> 2011-03-21 18:18:48
EDT ---
Thanks for the quick work!
Actually, there's one last step we should take, and that's to include a copy of
the GPL with the package. (Second dot point in comment #2)
From the email, it sounds like it's unlikely that upstream will
generate a new
tarball for us, so instead could you please contact them again and:
* attach a copy of the GPLv1 (not any other version) to the email
* ask upstream if they're OK with you including a copy of that document in the
Fedora package.
We've just had a similar situation arise with another perl module, and the
advice above is based on what I got from Spot on legal list.[0]
Cheers,
Rudi
[0]
http://lists.fedoraproject.org/pipermail/legal/2011-March/001584.html
--
Configure bugmail:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug.