https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1620568
Iñaki Ucar i.ucar86@gmail.com changed:
What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |i.ucar86@gmail.com
--- Comment #6 from Iñaki Ucar i.ucar86@gmail.com --- (In reply to clime from comment #5)
In my opinion as an observer, the main think is to name the package differently, then there is going to be no conflict.
There is a thread in fedora-devel where they were talking about this kernel, and about the possibility of porting some of the patches to Fedora: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org/...
The conclusion was that many of these patches are Intel-specific, so it wouldn't be a good idea to port them to Fedora, because it would harm its aim. Someone proposed that the way to go was to maintain this in a Copr, and Manas volunteered.
Anyway, I don't know of any other kernel version accepted in the main repos with other name, and the packaging guidelines and policies talk about *the* kernel, as if there was just one. So at the very least, I think that someone from the kernel team should take a look at this ticket.
By the way, you can get the links to srpm and spec from the build in Copr https://copr-be.cloud.fedoraproject.org/results/pac23/ High_Performance_Clear_LInux_kernel_for_Fedora/fedora-rawhide-x86_64/ 00777716-kernel/
Robert-André knows how to get the SPEC and the SRPM from a Copr repo, but that's not the procedure. There is even a template when you open a review request to link them, so that the reviewer can use the fedora-review tool just with the bug ID.