[Bug 1246498] Review Request: golang-googlecode-xsrftoken -
Generating and validating secure XSRF tokens
by bugzilla@redhat.com
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1246498
Elliott Sales de Andrade <quantum.analyst(a)gmail.com> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Status|NEW |CLOSED
Resolution|--- |CANTFIX
Flags|needinfo?(jchaloup(a)redhat.c |
|om) |
Last Closed| |2019-03-04 01:27:16
--- Comment #2 from Elliott Sales de Andrade <quantum.analyst(a)gmail.com> ---
I cannot download the source from the provided URL, so I'm going to close this.
Please open a new request for the package's new repo.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
4 years
[Bug 1246493] Review Request: golang-googlecode-rsc - Random source
code
by bugzilla@redhat.com
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1246493
Elliott Sales de Andrade <quantum.analyst(a)gmail.com> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Status|NEW |CLOSED
Resolution|--- |CANTFIX
Flags|needinfo?(jchaloup(a)redhat.c |
|om) |
Last Closed| |2019-03-04 01:25:35
--- Comment #2 from Elliott Sales de Andrade <quantum.analyst(a)gmail.com> ---
I cannot download the source from the provided URL, so I'm going to close this.
Please open a new request for the package's new repo.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
4 years
[Bug 866265] Review Request: opentrep - C++ API for parsing
travel-focused requests
by bugzilla@redhat.com
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=866265
Fedora Update System <updates(a)fedoraproject.org> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Status|ON_QA |CLOSED
Resolution|--- |ERRATA
Last Closed| |2019-03-04 00:51:24
--- Comment #40 from Fedora Update System <updates(a)fedoraproject.org> ---
opentrep-0.07.1-2.fc29 has been pushed to the Fedora 29 stable repository. If
problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
4 years
[Bug 1658199] Review Request: netatalk - Open Source Apple Filing
Protocol(AFP) File Server
by bugzilla@redhat.com
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1658199
--- Comment #38 from Fedora Update System <updates(a)fedoraproject.org> ---
netatalk-3.1.12-3.el7 has been submitted as an update to Fedora EPEL 7.
https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-EPEL-2019-a8c9558626
--- Comment #39 from Neal Gompa <ngompa13(a)gmail.com> ---
(In reply to Kevin Kofler from comment #13)
> (In reply to Neal Gompa from comment #3)
> > Drop the Epoch. It's been out of Fedora long enough that it should be
> > removed.
>
> I disagree. This package has been in Fedora with Epoch 5, so it should never
> be reintroduced with a lower (or no) Epoch. People do skip releases when
> upgrading, or even keep the package from the EOL release if the newer
> release no longer provides it but does not force its removal (either
> deliberately because they still need the package, or accidentally because
> they just forgot about it – and for the record, I am absolutely against
> forced obsoletion of retired packages as long as they still work because
> people may want to keep them deliberately). By dropping the Epoch, you break
> the upgrade path for the people who still have the F23 or pre-F24-Rawhide
> package installed for whatever reason, so they may end up still sticking
> with the obsolete package.
That literally does not matter since system upgrades happen with distro-sync,
which ignores Epochs. But it's too late now. :(
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
4 years