[Bug 1288731] New: Review Request: os-autoinst - OS-level test automation
by Red Hat Bugzilla
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1288731
Bug ID: 1288731
Summary: Review Request: os-autoinst - OS-level test automation
Product: Fedora
Version: rawhide
Component: Package Review
Severity: medium
Priority: medium
Assignee: nobody(a)fedoraproject.org
Reporter: awilliam(a)redhat.com
QA Contact: extras-qa(a)fedoraproject.org
CC: package-review(a)lists.fedoraproject.org
Spec URL: https://www.happyassassin.net/reviews/os-autoinst.spec
SRPM URL:
https://www.happyassassin.net/reviews/os-autoinst-4.2.1-5.fc24.src.rpm
Description: The OS-autoinst project aims at providing a means to run fully
automated tests. Especially to run tests of basic and low-level operating
system components such as bootloader, kernel, installer and upgrade, which can
not easily and safely be tested with other automated testing frameworks.
However, it can just as well be used to test applications on top of a newly
installed OS. NOTE: os-autoinst is the test runner for openQA, which we are
working to include in the official repos so we no longer need to use a COPR for
the Fedora openQA deployments. This build is in the COPR -
https://copr.fedoraproject.org/coprs/adamwill/openQA - and is already being
used by the workers for the Fedora openQA deployment.
Fedora Account System Username: adamwill
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
8 years, 2 months
[Bug 1300003] Review Request: fleet-commander - Admin interface for Fleet Commander
by Red Hat Bugzilla
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1300003
David King <dking(a)redhat.com> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
CC| |dking(a)redhat.com
--- Comment #10 from David King <dking(a)redhat.com> ---
Package Review
==============
Legend:
[x] = Pass, [!] = Fail, [-] = Not applicable, [?] = Not evaluated
Issues:
=======
- Package installs a %{name}.desktop using desktop-file-install or
desktop-file-validate if there is such a file.
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging:Guidelines#desktop-file-install_...
(I am not sure if this is necessary any more, with file triggers found in
recent rpm versions.)
- The %license macro must be used to list the COPYING* files.
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging:LicensingGuidelines#License_Text
- The License tag mentions that the package is under LGPLv2+, but there are
some files which are GPLv2+.
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging:LicensingGuidelines#Multiple_Lic...
- File/directory ownership, as listed below
- Bundles spice-html5 without a Provides (also some fonts, according to
fedora-review):
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging:Guidelines#Bundling_and_Duplicat...
===== MUST items =====
Generic:
[x]: Package is licensed with an open-source compatible license and meets
other legal requirements as defined in the legal section of Packaging
Guidelines.
[!]: If (and only if) the source package includes the text of the
license(s) in its own file, then that file, containing the text of the
license(s) for the package is included in %license.
[!]: License field in the package spec file matches the actual license.
Note: Checking patched sources after %prep for licenses. Licenses
found: "LGPL", "GPL (v2 or later)", "Unknown or generated", "MIT/X11
(BSD like)", "LGPL (v3 or later)", "BSD (3 clause)", "MIT/X11 (BSD
like) LGPL (v3 or later)". 21 files have unknown license. Detailed
output of licensecheck in /home/david/checkout/rpms/1300003-fleet-
commander-admin/licensecheck.txt
[!]: License file installed when any subpackage combination is installed.
[!]: If the package is under multiple licenses, the licensing breakdown
must be documented in the spec.
[x]: Package requires other packages for directories it uses.
Note: No known owner of /usr/share/fleet-commander-admin,
/etc/dbus-1/system.d, /usr/share/fleet-commander-
admin/python/fleetcommander, /usr/share/fleet-commander-admin/python
[!]: Package must own all directories that it creates.
Note: Directories without known owners: /etc/dbus-1/system.d,
/usr/share/fleet-commander-admin, /usr/share/fleet-commander-
admin/python, /usr/share/fleet-commander-admin/python/fleetcommander
[!]: Package contains no bundled libraries without FPC exception.
[x]: Changelog in prescribed format.
[x]: Sources contain only permissible code or content.
[-]: Development files must be in a -devel package
[-]: Package uses nothing in %doc for runtime.
[x]: Package consistently uses macros (instead of hard-coded directory
names).
[x]: Package is named according to the Package Naming Guidelines.
[x]: Package does not generate any conflict.
[x]: Package obeys FHS, except libexecdir and /usr/target.
[-]: If the package is a rename of another package, proper Obsoletes and
Provides are present.
[x]: Requires correct, justified where necessary.
[x]: Spec file is legible and written in American English.
[x]: Package contains systemd file(s) if in need.
[x]: Package is not known to require an ExcludeArch tag.
[x]: Package complies to the Packaging Guidelines
[x]: Package successfully compiles and builds into binary rpms on at least
one supported primary architecture.
[x]: Package installs properly.
[x]: Rpmlint is run on all rpms the build produces.
Note: There are rpmlint messages (see attachment).
[x]: Package does not own files or directories owned by other packages.
[x]: All build dependencies are listed in BuildRequires, except for any
that are listed in the exceptions section of Packaging Guidelines.
[x]: Package uses either %{buildroot} or $RPM_BUILD_ROOT
[x]: Package does not run rm -rf %{buildroot} (or $RPM_BUILD_ROOT) at the
beginning of %install.
[x]: %config files are marked noreplace or the reason is justified.
[x]: Macros in Summary, %description expandable at SRPM build time.
[x]: Package contains desktop file if it is a GUI application.
[x]: Dist tag is present.
[x]: Package does not contain duplicates in %files.
[x]: Permissions on files are set properly.
[x]: Package use %makeinstall only when make install DESTDIR=... doesn't
work.
[x]: Package is named using only allowed ASCII characters.
[x]: No %config files under /usr.
[x]: Package does not use a name that already exists.
[x]: Package is not relocatable.
[x]: Sources used to build the package match the upstream source, as
provided in the spec URL.
[x]: Spec file name must match the spec package %{name}, in the format
%{name}.spec.
[x]: File names are valid UTF-8.
[x]: Large documentation must go in a -doc subpackage. Large could be size
(~1MB) or number of files.
Note: Documentation size is 0 bytes in 0 files.
[x]: Packages must not store files under /srv, /opt or /usr/local
Python:
[x]: Python eggs must not download any dependencies during the build
process.
[-]: A package which is used by another package via an egg interface should
provide egg info.
[x]: Package meets the Packaging Guidelines::Python
[x]: Package contains BR: python2-devel or python3-devel
[x]: Binary eggs must be removed in %prep
===== SHOULD items =====
Generic:
[?]: Avoid bundling fonts in non-fonts packages.
Note: Package contains font files
[-]: If the source package does not include license text(s) as a separate
file from upstream, the packager SHOULD query upstream to include it.
[x]: Final provides and requires are sane (see attachments).
[x]: Fully versioned dependency in subpackages if applicable.
Note: No Requires: %{name}%{?_isa} = %{version}-%{release} in fleet-
commander-logger
[?]: Package functions as described.
[x]: Latest version is packaged.
[x]: Package does not include license text files separate from upstream.
[-]: Description and summary sections in the package spec file contains
translations for supported Non-English languages, if available.
[?]: Package should compile and build into binary rpms on all supported
architectures.
[!]: %check is present and all tests pass.
[?]: Packages should try to preserve timestamps of original installed
files.
[x]: Packager, Vendor, PreReq, Copyright tags should not be in spec file
[x]: Sources can be downloaded from URI in Source: tag
[x]: Reviewer should test that the package builds in mock.
[x]: Buildroot is not present
[x]: Package has no %clean section with rm -rf %{buildroot} (or
$RPM_BUILD_ROOT)
[x]: No file requires outside of /etc, /bin, /sbin, /usr/bin, /usr/sbin.
[x]: SourceX is a working URL.
[x]: Spec use %global instead of %define unless justified.
===== EXTRA items =====
Generic:
[x]: Rpmlint is run on all installed packages.
Note: There are rpmlint messages (see attachment).
[x]: Spec file according to URL is the same as in SRPM.
Rpmlint
-------
Checking: fleet-commander-admin-0.7.2-1.fc24.noarch.rpm
fleet-commander-logger-0.7.2-1.fc24.noarch.rpm
fleet-commander-admin-0.7.2-1.fc24.src.rpm
fleet-commander-admin.noarch: W: no-documentation
fleet-commander-admin.noarch: W: non-standard-uid
/var/lib/fleet-commander-admin fleet-commander-admin
fleet-commander-admin.noarch: W: non-standard-uid
/var/lib/fleet-commander-admin/profiles fleet-commander-admin
fleet-commander-admin.noarch: W: no-manual-page-for-binary
fleet-commander-standalone
fleet-commander-logger.noarch: E: explicit-lib-dependency json-glib
fleet-commander-logger.noarch: E: explicit-lib-dependency libsoup
fleet-commander-logger.noarch: W: no-documentation
fleet-commander-logger.noarch: W: non-conffile-in-etc
/etc/xdg/autostart/fleet-commander-logger.desktop
fleet-commander-admin.src: W: invalid-url Source0:
https://github.com/fleet-commander/fc-admin/releases/download/0.7.2/fleet...
HTTP Error 403: Forbidden
3 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 2 errors, 7 warnings.
Rpmlint (installed packages)
----------------------------
fleet-commander-logger.noarch: E: explicit-lib-dependency json-glib
fleet-commander-logger.noarch: E: explicit-lib-dependency libsoup
fleet-commander-logger.noarch: W: no-documentation
fleet-commander-logger.noarch: W: non-conffile-in-etc
/etc/xdg/autostart/fleet-commander-logger.desktop
fleet-commander-admin.noarch: W: no-documentation
fleet-commander-admin.noarch: W: non-standard-uid
/var/lib/fleet-commander-admin fleet-commander-admin
fleet-commander-admin.noarch: W: non-standard-uid
/var/lib/fleet-commander-admin/profiles fleet-commander-admin
fleet-commander-admin.noarch: W: no-manual-page-for-binary
fleet-commander-standalone
2 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 2 errors, 6 warnings.
Requires
--------
fleet-commander-logger (rpmlib, GLIBC filtered):
/usr/bin/gjs
gjs
json-glib
libsoup
fleet-commander-admin (rpmlib, GLIBC filtered):
/bin/sh
/usr/bin/python
config(fleet-commander-admin)
dbus-python
dconf
httpd
libvirt-python
mod_wsgi
numpy
pygobject2
python
python-crypto
python-websockify
systemd
Provides
--------
fleet-commander-logger:
fleet-commander-logger
fleet-commander-admin:
config(fleet-commander-admin)
fleet-commander-admin
Source checksums
----------------
https://github.com/fleet-commander/fc-admin/releases/download/0.7.2/fleet...
:
CHECKSUM(SHA256) this package :
ba9ebf71d2a95a478233f76be166e76984db12520d7f9204b8404a652571348a
CHECKSUM(SHA256) upstream package :
ba9ebf71d2a95a478233f76be166e76984db12520d7f9204b8404a652571348a
Generated by fedora-review 0.6.0 (3c5c9d7) last change: 2015-05-20
Command line :/usr/bin/fedora-review -b 1300003
Buildroot used: fedora-rawhide-x86_64
Active plugins: Python, Generic, Shell-api
Disabled plugins: Java, C/C++, fonts, SugarActivity, Ocaml, Perl, Haskell, R,
PHP, Ruby
Disabled flags: EXARCH, DISTTAG, EPEL5, BATCH, EPEL6
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
8 years, 2 months