[Bug 632853] Review Request: pptpd - PoPToP Point to Point Tunneling Server
by Red Hat Bugzilla
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=632853
Tom "spot" Callaway <tcallawa(a)redhat.com> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
CC| |tcallawa(a)redhat.com
Blocks|182235 (FE-Legal) |
--- Comment #37 from Tom "spot" Callaway <tcallawa(a)redhat.com> ---
(In reply to Mathieu Bridon from comment #35)
> Copy-pasting my licensing doubts in this comment, to make it easier for the
> legal folks to review.
>
> Note that the ppp header has been unbundled.
>
> [!]: License field in the package spec file matches the actual license.
>
> The following files are GPLv2+:
>
> - bcrelay.c
> - plugins/pptpd-logwtmp.c
> - tools/vpnstats.pl
>
> The following files are under the LGPLv2+ license. (they are copied from
> the glibc)
>
> - getopt1.c
> - getopt.c
> - our_getopt.h
>
> The following files are under a BSD that I've never seen before, and
> isn't
> even in the wiki page:
>
> - plugins/pppd.h
I don't actually see this file in the pptpd package, but I looked at the one in
the ppp-devel package and it is a variant of the "BSD with Attribution"
license, so just add that to the License tag if it is actually in the pptpd
package.
> The following files are said to be copied from RFC 1662:
>
> - ppphdlc.c
> - ppphdlc.h
These are clearly derived from the pptpclient source by C. S. Ananian, which is
GPLv2+, so these files can be considered to be under that license as well.
Assuming that the pppd.h file isn't in pptpd, the license tag should be:
GPLv2+ and LGPLv2+
Lifting FE-Legal.
Referenced Bugs:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=182235
[Bug 182235] Fedora Legal Tracker
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
9 years, 4 months