[Bug 745123] New: Review request: cryptsetup
by Red Hat Bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
Summary: Review request: cryptsetup
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=745123
Summary: Review request: cryptsetup
Product: Fedora
Version: rawhide
Platform: Unspecified
OS/Version: Unspecified
Status: NEW
Severity: unspecified
Priority: unspecified
Component: Package Review
AssignedTo: nobody(a)fedoraproject.org
ReportedBy: mbroz(a)redhat.com
QAContact: extras-qa(a)fedoraproject.org
CC: notting(a)redhat.com,
package-review(a)lists.fedoraproject.org
Classification: Fedora
Story Points: ---
Type: ---
Rename project from cryptsetup-luks to cryptsetup (according to upstream name).
Spec URL: http://mbroz.fedorapeople.org/review/cryptsetup.spec
SRPM URL:
http://mbroz.fedorapeople.org/review/cryptsetup-1.4.0-0.1.fc17.src.rpm
Diff to last cryptsetup-luks.spec:
http://mbroz.fedorapeople.org/review/spec.diff
# rpmlint cryptsetup.spec
cryptsetup.spec: W: invalid-url Source0:
http://cryptsetup.googlecode.com/files/cryptsetup-1.4.0-rc1.tar.bz2 HTTP Error
404: Not Found
0 packages and 1 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 1 warnings.
(known bug, file is there)
# rpmlint cryptsetup-1.4.0-0.1.fc17.src.rpm
cryptsetup.src: W: spelling-error %description -l en_US dm -> d, m, dim
cryptsetup.src: W: invalid-url Source0:
http://cryptsetup.googlecode.com/files/cryptsetup-1.4.0-rc1.tar.bz2 HTTP Error
404: Not Found
1 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 2 warnings.
# rpmlint cryptsetup*.rpm
cryptsetup.x86_64: W: spelling-error %description -l en_US dm -> d, m, dim
cryptsetup.x86_64: E: incorrect-fsf-address
/usr/share/doc/cryptsetup-1.4.0/COPYING
cryptsetup-debuginfo.x86_64: E: incorrect-fsf-address
/usr/src/debug/cryptsetup-1.4.0-rc1/lib/libdevmapper.c
cryptsetup-debuginfo.x86_64: E: incorrect-fsf-address
/usr/src/debug/cryptsetup-1.4.0-rc1/lib/utils_wipe.c
cryptsetup-debuginfo.x86_64: E: incorrect-fsf-address
/usr/src/debug/cryptsetup-1.4.0-rc1/lib/random.c
cryptsetup-debuginfo.x86_64: E: incorrect-fsf-address
/usr/src/debug/cryptsetup-1.4.0-rc1/lib/utils_debug.c
cryptsetup-debuginfo.x86_64: E: incorrect-fsf-address
/usr/src/debug/cryptsetup-1.4.0-rc1/lib/utils_devpath.c
cryptsetup-debuginfo.x86_64: E: incorrect-fsf-address
/usr/src/debug/cryptsetup-1.4.0-rc1/lib/luks1/af.c
cryptsetup-debuginfo.x86_64: E: incorrect-fsf-address
/usr/src/debug/cryptsetup-1.4.0-rc1/lib/utils.c
cryptsetup-debuginfo.x86_64: E: incorrect-fsf-address
/usr/src/debug/cryptsetup-1.4.0-rc1/lib/crypt_plain.c
cryptsetup-debuginfo.x86_64: E: incorrect-fsf-address
/usr/src/debug/cryptsetup-1.4.0-rc1/lib/setup.c
cryptsetup-debuginfo.x86_64: E: incorrect-fsf-address
/usr/src/debug/cryptsetup-1.4.0-rc1/lib/utils_crypt.c
cryptsetup-debuginfo.x86_64: E: incorrect-fsf-address
/usr/src/debug/cryptsetup-1.4.0-rc1/lib/crypto_backend/crypto_gcrypt.c
cryptsetup-debuginfo.x86_64: E: incorrect-fsf-address
/usr/src/debug/cryptsetup-1.4.0-rc1/lib/loopaes/loopaes.c
cryptsetup-debuginfo.x86_64: E: incorrect-fsf-address
/usr/src/debug/cryptsetup-1.4.0-rc1/lib/luks1/keymanage.c
cryptsetup-debuginfo.x86_64: E: incorrect-fsf-address
/usr/src/debug/cryptsetup-1.4.0-rc1/lib/luks1/keyencryption.c
cryptsetup-debuginfo.x86_64: E: incorrect-fsf-address
/usr/src/debug/cryptsetup-1.4.0-rc1/lib/volumekey.c
cryptsetup-debuginfo.x86_64: E: incorrect-fsf-address
/usr/src/debug/cryptsetup-1.4.0-rc1/src/cryptsetup.c
cryptsetup-debuginfo.x86_64: E: incorrect-fsf-address
/usr/src/debug/cryptsetup-1.4.0-rc1/lib/utils_loop.c
cryptsetup-libs.x86_64: W: spelling-error %description -l en_US libcryptsetup
-> cryptically
cryptsetup-libs.x86_64: E: incorrect-fsf-address
/usr/share/doc/cryptsetup-libs-1.4.0/COPYING
4 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 19 errors, 2 warnings.
(Ignoring fsf address, I cannot change upstream license every time they move to
new office! Other are false positives.)
--
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug.
12 years, 5 months
[Bug 472639] New: Review Request: Scilab - Numerical Analysis toolkit
by Red Hat Bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
Summary: Review Request: Scilab - Numerical Analysis toolkit
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=472639
Summary: Review Request: Scilab - Numerical Analysis toolkit
Product: Fedora
Version: 9
Platform: All
OS/Version: Linux
Status: NEW
Severity: medium
Priority: medium
Component: Package Review
AssignedTo: nobody(a)fedoraproject.org
ReportedBy: mycae(a)yahoo.com
QAContact: extras-qa(a)fedoraproject.org
CC: notting(a)redhat.com, fedora-package-review(a)redhat.com
Depends on: 439630,464781,468797
Estimated Hours: 0.0
Classification: Fedora
Spec URL: http://dhd.selfip.com/427e/scilab.spec
SRPM URL: http://dhd.selfip.com/427e/scilab-5.0.1-1.fc9.src.rpm
Description: Scilab is a scientific software package for numerical computations
providing a powerful open computing environment for engineering and scientific
applications.
rpmlint -iv output is empty.
Notes:
*Requires Javahelp2, which is only available in F10 (I believe). I cheated and
used an RPM available here:
(http://rpmfind.net/linux/RPM/fedora/devel/i386/javahelp2-2.0.05-5.fc10.no...).
Package review is bug 439263.
*In-program help has not been built, we probably want this.
*The makefile that is included seems to call gcc & gfortran for the install
target to perform some final linking operations -- this seems very very odd.
What to do? Do I need to make gcc and gfortran "Requires:" of scilab? It also
really slows down the %install target of rpmbuild.
*I get a *lot* of "file listed twice" warnings from rpmbuild -- is * recursive
in the %files section?
Notes to other packagers/reviewers:
*Scilab is fairly big. It takes a while to complete a build -- ~1hr on a 2.1
GHz machine. If you plan to rebuild more than once or twice, use ccache to
speed it up a little (not all the time is spent on C/C++ compiling though).
*I am having problems getting PVM to link correctly, as such I have disabled it
-- if anyone wants to have a shot at patching this, please do. I have left the
patches that fix a few problems with PVM in there for anyone looking at it.
Probably just needs someone to correct the PVM_LIB value.
*Need to set LD_LIBRARY_PATH to find JVM (libjava, libjvm, libhpi) before
running scilab-bin. It can't find it for some reason
*I have not tested parallel building to see if it works, how do we test this?
Finally my upload bandwidth is not terrible, but it isn't massive, so patience
when getting the SRPM :)
--
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug.
12 years, 5 months