[Bug 431237] New: Review Request: perl-Text-Format - Various subroutines to format text
by Red Hat Bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=431237
Summary: Review Request: perl-Text-Format - Various subroutines
to format text
Product: Fedora
Version: rawhide
Platform: All
OS/Version: Linux
Status: NEW
Severity: medium
Priority: medium
Component: Package Review
AssignedTo: nobody(a)fedoraproject.org
ReportedBy: xavier(a)bachelot.org
QAContact: extras-qa(a)fedoraproject.org
CC: fedora-package-review@redhat.com,notting(a)redhat.com
Spec URL: http://washington.kelkoo.net/fedora/SPECS/perl-Text-Format.spec
SRPM URL: http://washington.kelkoo.net/fedora/SRPMS/perl-Text-Format-0.52-1.fc8.src...
Description:
The format routine will format under all circumstances even if the width isn't
enough to contain the longest words. Text::Wrap will die under these
circumstances, although I am told this is fixed. If columns is set to a small
number and words are longer than that and the leading 'whitespace' than there
will be a single word on each line. This will let you make a simple word list
which could be indented or right aligned. There is a chance for croaking if you
try to subvert the module. If you don't pass in text then the internal text is
worked on, though not modified. Text::Format is meant for more powerful text
formatting than Text::Wrap allows. I also have a module called Text::NWrap that
is meant as a direct replacement for Text::Wrap. Text::NWrap requires
Text::Format since it uses Text::Format->format to do the actual wrapping but
gives you the interface of Text::Wrap.
--
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is.
16 years, 1 month
[Bug 239184] New: Review Request: libdc1394 - High level API for IEEE 1394 based cameras
by Red Hat Bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=239184
Summary: Review Request: libdc1394 - High level API for IEEE 1394
based cameras
Product: Fedora Extras
Version: devel
Platform: All
OS/Version: Linux
Status: NEW
Severity: medium
Priority: medium
Component: Package Review
AssignedTo: nobody(a)fedoraproject.org
ReportedBy: kwizart(a)gmail.com
QAContact: fedora-package-review(a)redhat.com
Spec URL:
http://kwizart.free.fr/fedora/rpmfusion/libdc1394.spec
SRPM URL:
http://kwizart.free.fr/fedora/rpmfusion/libdc1394-1.2.1-1.kwizart.fc6.src...
Description: High level API for IEEE 1394 based cameras
rpmlint is silent enought on binaries and sources...
As this spec files was taken from atrpms version.
I will request Axel some advices about replacement policy for this package
and his packaging scheme...
For example, what is the aim for : %lib_package dc1394_control 13 ?
Whereas libs are :
[root@Kwizatz lib64]# ls -al
total 84
drwxr-xr-x 2 builder builder 4096 mai 5 21:02 .
drwxr-xr-x 8 builder builder 4096 mai 5 21:02 ..
lrwxrwxrwx 1 builder builder 27 mai 5 21:02 libdc1394_control.so -> libdc1394_control.so.12.1.1
lrwxrwxrwx 1 builder builder 27 mai 5 21:02 libdc1394_control.so.12 -> libdc1394_control.so.12.1.1
-rwxr-xr-x 1 builder builder 73168 mai 5 21:02 libdc1394_control.so.12.1.1
I was working on libdc1394(-1) before seen -2 from Matthias
i would like to work with him in case we choose to provides a -2 version...
See: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/239043
--
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact.
16 years, 1 month
[Bug 187243] Review Request: lazarus : IDE and RAD tool for the free pascal compiler (fpc)
by Red Hat Bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.
Summary: Review Request: lazarus : IDE and RAD tool for the free pascal compiler (fpc)
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=187243
------- Additional Comments From joost(a)cnoc.nl 2008-02-01 19:05 EST -------
(In reply to comment #38)
> So this is back in the pool. Perhaps I'll find the time to look at it if nobody
> beats me to it. If the package in comment 34 is the one you'd like reviewed,
> please say so or go ahead and drop another package.
Great that you want to help me to improve this package.
> However, some things I didn't see mentioned before. One warning from
> desktop-file-install during the package build:
Fixed
> lazarus.src: W: invalid-license GPL, MPL
> lazarus.src: W: invalid-license modified LGPL
> Please use proper License tags according to
> http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Licensing and
> http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/LicensingGuidelines. If the "modified
> LGPL" in use doesn't fit any existing tags and something like "LGPLv2+ with
> exceptions" isn't close enough then you will need to have the licensing experts
> assign a new tag for you.
I've asked on the fedora-legal-list and they said I should use the "LGPL+ with
exceptions" tag with a note that it was in fact the GNU classpath-exception
> lazarus.x86_64: E: non-executable-script
> /usr/lib64/lazarus/components/lazreport/doc/cvs2cl.pl 0644
> lazarus.x86_64: E: non-executable-script
> /usr/lib64/lazarus/examples/trayicon/createbundle.sh 0644
> lazarus.x86_64: E: non-executable-script
> /usr/lib64/lazarus/components/lazreport/tools/localize.sh 0644
> Are you sure these shouldn't be executable? What will call them?
First script is obsolete, but I added the execute-flag anyway. Second is a
script used on OS/X only, so that shoudn't be executable. And the last script
should indeed have the executable-flag set. Fixed.
> lazarus.x86_64: E: non-executable-script
> /usr/lib64/lazarus/tools/install/cross_unix/debian_crosswin32/postrm 0644
> I thought that according to comments above that this would be going away.
I didn't saw these files. Removed them.
> lazarus.x86_64: W: ldd-failed /usr/lib64/lazarus/tools/svn2revisioninc
> I think this was covered in a discussion above about fpc output always being
> static, and should be OK.
I've made a new package with these changes: (build with f7, I have no other
system available here atm): http://www.cnoc.nl/fpc/lazarus-0.9.24-2.fc7.src.rpm
--
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact.
16 years, 1 month