[Bug 171993] Review Request: mpich2 - An implementation of MPI
by Red Hat Bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=171993
--- Comment #86 from Jussi Lehtola <jussi.lehtola(a)iki.fi> 2008-11-03 06:03:48 EDT ---
(In reply to comment #85)
> (In reply to comment #84)
> > On another note, the spec should be modified to use mpi-selector in RHEL and
> > environment-modules in Fedora so that users can easily select which environment
> > to use. Alternatives is system-wide, and should not be used.
> >
> For one, mpi-selector in not in Fedora. And I've included support for using
> environment-modules in the package since a long time ago. I prefer using
> alternatives on my workstation, so I don't think support for that should be
> removed.
Well, I was referring to mpi-selector in EPEL. You're not interested in EPEL?
Also, you're not requiring the environment-modules package in Fedora.
> > Deji, are you still interested on working on the package?
> srpm and rpm spec files for the latest release are available below;
> ftp://czar.eas.yorku.ca/pub/mpich2/mpich2-1.0.8-1.fc10.src.rpm
> ftp://czar.eas.yorku.ca/pub/mpich2/mpich2.spec
OK.
Could you add some comments on the BRs? To me BR emacs-common and gdb are a bit
odd..
According to GCC man page, -fPIC only makes a difference on the m68k, PowerPC
and SPARC (compared to -fpic?). Thus, should you have -fPIC also on ppc
architectures?
Why don't you have --enable-f77 in the configure phase?
Since the package has Java functionality, you must follow the Java Packaging
guidelines:
MUST have:
BuildRequires: java-devel [>= specific_version]
BuildRequires: jpackage-utils
Requires: java >= specific_version
Requires: jpackage-utils
Also, in the setup phase, clean out old .jar files:
find -name '*.jar' -o -name '*.class' -exec rm -f '{}' \;
Otherwise the spec file seems quite clean to me. This is really an
embarrassment, having had the package on review for 3 years.
--
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the QA contact for the bug.
15 years, 5 months
[Bug 171993] Review Request: mpich2 - An implementation of MPI
by Red Hat Bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=171993
--- Comment #85 from Deji Akingunola <dakingun(a)gmail.com> 2008-11-03 04:09:28 EDT ---
(In reply to comment #84)
> It isn't assigned to anyone, so I'm clearing the flag to NEW.
>
> On another note, the spec should be modified to use mpi-selector in RHEL and
> environment-modules in Fedora so that users can easily select which environment
> to use. Alternatives is system-wide, and should not be used.
>
For one, mpi-selector in not in Fedora. And I've included support for using
environment-modules in the package since a long time ago. I prefer using
alternatives on my workstation, so I don't think support for that should be
removed.
> Deji, are you still interested on working on the package?
srpm and rpm spec files for the latest release are available below;
ftp://czar.eas.yorku.ca/pub/mpich2/mpich2-1.0.8-1.fc10.src.rpm
ftp://czar.eas.yorku.ca/pub/mpich2/mpich2.spec
--
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the QA contact for the bug.
15 years, 5 months
[Bug 171993] Review Request: mpich2 - An implementation of MPI
by Red Hat Bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=171993
Jussi Lehtola <jussi.lehtola(a)iki.fi> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Status|ASSIGNED |NEW
CC| |jussi.lehtola(a)iki.fi
--- Comment #84 from Jussi Lehtola <jussi.lehtola(a)iki.fi> 2008-11-03 03:47:03 EDT ---
It isn't assigned to anyone, so I'm clearing the flag to NEW.
On another note, the spec should be modified to use mpi-selector in RHEL and
environment-modules in Fedora so that users can easily select which environment
to use. Alternatives is system-wide, and should not be used.
Deji, are you still interested on working on the package?
--
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the QA contact for the bug.
15 years, 5 months
[Bug 382371] New: Review Request: gnome-do - quick object search and interaction
by Red Hat Bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=382371
Summary: Review Request: gnome-do - quick object search and
interaction
Product: Fedora
Version: devel
Platform: All
OS/Version: Linux
Status: NEW
Severity: medium
Priority: medium
Component: Package Review
AssignedTo: nobody(a)fedoraproject.org
ReportedBy: david(a)lovesunix.net
QAContact: extras-qa(a)fedoraproject.org
CC: fedora-package-review@redhat.com,notting(a)redhat.com
Spec URL: http://www.lovesunix.net/fedora/gnome-do.spec
SRPM URL: http://www.lovesunix.net/fedora/gnome-do-0.0.2-1.fc8.src.rpm
Description: GNOME Do allows you to quickly search for many objects present in your GNOME desktop environment (applications, Evolution contacts, Firefox bookmarks, files, artists and albums in Rhythmbox, Pidgin buddies) and perform commonly used commands on those objects (Run, Open, Email, Chat, Play, etc.).
--
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is.
15 years, 5 months
[Bug 467051] New: Review Request: arp-scan - scan network using ARP protocol.
by Red Hat Bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
Summary: Review Request: arp-scan - scan network using ARP protocol.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=467051
Summary: Review Request: arp-scan - scan network using ARP
protocol.
Product: Fedora
Version: rawhide
Platform: All
OS/Version: Linux
Status: NEW
Severity: medium
Priority: medium
Component: Package Review
AssignedTo: nobody(a)fedoraproject.org
ReportedBy: itamar(a)ispbrasil.com.br
QAContact: extras-qa(a)fedoraproject.org
CC: notting(a)redhat.com, fedora-package-review(a)redhat.com
Estimated Hours: 0.0
Classification: Fedora
Spec URL: http://ispbrasil.com.br/arp-scan/arp-scan.spec
SRPM URL: http://ispbrasil.com.br/arp-scan/arp-scan-1.7-1.fc10.src.rpm
Description:
arp-scan sends ARP (Address Resolution Protocol) queries to the specified
targets, and displays any responses that are received. It allows any part
of the outgoing ARP packets to be changed, allowing the behavior of targets
to non-standard ARP packets to be examined. The IP address and hardware
address of received packets are displayed, together with the vendor details.
These details are obtained from the IEEE OUI and IAB listings, plus a few
manual entries. It includes arp-fingerprint, which allows a system to be
fingerprinted based on how it responds to non-standard ARP packets.
arp-scan is very useful if you want to migrate a network to use DHCP
--
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug.
15 years, 5 months