[Bug 457947] Review Request: oldstandard-fonts - Old Standard Fonts
by Red Hat Bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=457947
Jens Petersen <petersen(a)redhat.com> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
CC| |petersen(a)redhat.com
--- Comment #2 from Jens Petersen <petersen(a)redhat.com> 2008-10-05 23:45:17 EDT ---
The spec file and package name differ. Shouldn't the package be named
69oldstandard as you also originally submitted?
rpmlint says:
69oldstandard-fonts.src: E: description-line-too-long Old Standard is an
attempt to provide a high quality font, suitable for classical, biblical and
medieval studies as well as for general-purpose typesetting in languages which
use Greek or Cyrillic script,
69oldstandard-fonts.src: E: no-changelogname-tag
69oldstandard-fonts.src: W: non-coherent-filename
oldstandard-fonts-1-1.fc9.src.rpm 69oldstandard-fonts-1-1.fc9.src.rpm
error checking signature of oldstandard-fonts-1-1.fc9.src.rpm
1 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 2 errors, 1 warnings.
Do you really need these:
<match target="pattern">
<test name="family">
<string>sans-serif</string>
</test>
<test name="lang" compare="contains">
<string>jp</string>
</test>
<edit name="lang" mode="prepend" binding="strong">
<string>en</string>
</edit>
</match>
<alias>
<family>sans-serif</family>
<prefer>
<family>DejaVu Sans</family>
</prefer>
</alias>
in the fontconfig file?
The srpm file also seems to be corrupted I am afraid:
69oldstandard-fonts-1-1.fc9
warning: user Package does not exist - using root
warning: group Package does not exist - using root
warning: user Package does not exist - using root
warning: group Package does not exist - using root
warning: user Ankur does not exist - using root
warning: group Ankur does not exist - using root
error: unpacking of archive failed on file
/home/package-review/oldstandard-fonts/oldstand-1.0.ttf.zip;48e9897c: cpio:
read
--
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug.
15 years, 6 months
[Bug 457925] Review Request: biniax - An unique arcade logic game
by Red Hat Bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=457925
Orcan Ogetbil <orcanbahri(a)yahoo.com> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
CC| |orcanbahri(a)yahoo.com
--- Comment #1 from Orcan Ogetbil <orcanbahri(a)yahoo.com> 2008-10-05 02:53:23 EDT ---
The package is in good condition. Some notes:
-------------------------------------------------------------------------
The line:
dos2unix Readme.txt LICENSE.txt
is not necassary. You can use "sed" instead. See:
http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/PackageMaintainers/Common_Rpmlint_Issues#wr...
So you can remove dos2unix from BuildRequires
-------------------------------------------------------------------------
$RPM_OPT_FLAGS is not passed to gcc correctly. Hence the debuginfo package is
not useful.
-------------------------------------------------------------------------
Please be consistent with macros. e.g. in the spec file there is
cp -ra data/* %{buildroot}%{_datadir}/biniax/data
in one line and
%{_datadir}/%{name}
on the other.
-------------------------------------------------------------------------
It would be nice if you can make the desktop file richer. Please see:
http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/Guidelines#Desktop_files
At least, have those fields that are given in that example full.
For instance "Name:Biniax" (mind the capital letter) would look nicer.
-------------------------------------------------------------------------
Summary: An unique ...
should be
Summary: A unique ...
-------------------------------------------------------------------------
The game does not exit properly. I have to kill the process in order to exit
the game.
Is this because of your patch?
--
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug.
15 years, 6 months
[Bug 465534] Resurrect awesfx package
by Red Hat Bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=465534
Jason Tibbitts <tibbs(a)math.uh.edu> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Status|NEW |CLOSED
Resolution| |NOTABUG
--- Comment #5 from Jason Tibbitts <tibbs(a)math.uh.edu> 2008-10-04 11:25:04 EDT ---
Since this is currently a package review ticket, and a package isn't actually
being submitted here, I can only close it. I would try to assign it to a more
appropriate component, except that it started at "kernel" for some reason.
Bottom line: Fedora is a community project. If someone steps up to maintain
the package, they can open a proper package review ticket and, once the review
process is done, the package can reappear in Fedora. Without a maintainer, the
package can't be in the distro.
--
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug.
15 years, 6 months
[Bug 465534] Resurrect awesfx package
by Red Hat Bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=465534
--- Comment #4 from Artem S. Tashkinov <t.artem(a)mailcity.com> 2008-10-04 06:16:45 EDT ---
I hope someone will come up and maintain this package. I'm sorry but I don't
have enough competence and I'm not much inclined to do this kind of work.
The last but not the least - why is this package obsolete? I don't know any
other utilities which can load sound banks into Creative sound cards.
--
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug.
15 years, 6 months
[Bug 454215] New: Review Request: stk - Synthesis ToolKit in C++
by Red Hat Bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=454215
Summary: Review Request: stk - Synthesis ToolKit in C++
Product: Fedora
Version: rawhide
Platform: All
OS/Version: Linux
Status: NEW
Severity: medium
Priority: medium
Component: Package Review
AssignedTo: nobody(a)fedoraproject.org
ReportedBy: thomas.moschny(a)gmx.de
QAContact: extras-qa(a)fedoraproject.org
CC: fedora-package-review@redhat.com,notting(a)redhat.com
Spec URL: http://thm.fedorapeople.org/stk.spec
SRPM URL: http://thm.fedorapeople.org/stk-4.3.1-1.fc9.src.rpm
Description:
The Synthesis ToolKit in C++ (STK) is a set of open source audio
signal processing and algorithmic synthesis classes written in the C++
programming language. STK was designed to facilitate rapid development
of music synthesis and audio processing software, with an emphasis on
cross-platform functionality, realtime control, ease of use, and
educational example code. The Synthesis ToolKit is extremely portable
(it's mostly platform-independent C and C++ code), and it's completely
user-extensible (all source included, no unusual libraries, and no
hidden drivers). We like to think that this increases the chances that
our programs will still work in another 5-10 years. In fact, the
ToolKit has been working continuously for about 10 years now. STK
currently runs with realtime support (audio and MIDI) on Linux,
Macintosh OS X, and Windows computer platforms. Generic, non-realtime
support has been tested under NeXTStep, Sun, and other platforms and
should work with any standard C++ compiler.
Note: See the top of the spec file for a list of some open issues. The review should help solving them. This package is a prerequisite for lmms (bug 443771).
--
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is.
15 years, 6 months
[Bug 465534] Resurrect awesfx package
by Red Hat Bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=465534
Kevin Fenzi <kevin(a)tummy.com> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
CC| |kevin(a)tummy.com
--- Comment #3 from Kevin Fenzi <kevin(a)tummy.com> 2008-10-03 16:16:05 EDT ---
I communicated with the user on IRC, where they indicated they had no desire to
maintain this package.
Unless they have changed their mind, I suggest we close this NOTABUG.
--
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug.
15 years, 6 months