[Bug 187828] Review Request: log4net - A tool to output log statements to a variety of output targets
by Red Hat Bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.
Summary: Review Request: log4net - A tool to output log statements to a variety of output targets
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=187828
opensource(a)till.name changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
CC| |opensource(a)till.name
------- Additional Comments From opensource(a)till.name 2007-09-08 02:39 EST -------
Chirs, you cannot review you own package, so you should not assign this package
to you and set fedora-review to " ", otherwise no reviewer will find this review
request. I did by accident, because I used the wrong query. ;-) Also I guess the
FE-DEADREVIEW blocker should be removed and you should add yourself to CC. Or
maybe you should open a new review request, to make you reporter of the review
request, I am not sure.
--
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact.
16 years, 7 months
[Bug 187317] Review Request: mindi
by Red Hat Bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.
Summary: Review Request: mindi
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=187317
------- Additional Comments From bruno_cornec(a)hp.com 2007-09-07 04:54 EST -------
The version of busybox used by mindi is statically linked. So I have a patch to
handle that as it's not supported in busybox 1.2.x.
I have the need for precise functions built-in and some other *NOT* built in
(such as modules support).
I keep using an older version of busybox as that binary is cfritical for our
tool, and I don't want to pass my time testing newer versions all the time. I
need a very stable busybox for the recovery env, for which e.g. NFS is no
problem ...
3 good reasons IMO for the project to keep a separated package for that.
For afio and buffer I can also provide packages for fedora if there is a need
indeed to provide them (I thought they were already part of the distro and
didn't check that indeed).
--
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact.
16 years, 7 months