[Bug 188430] Review Request: gtk+
by Red Hat Bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.
Summary: Review Request: gtk+
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=188430
rdieter(a)math.unl.edu changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED
Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE
------- Additional Comments From rdieter(a)math.unl.edu 2006-05-04 12:53 EST -------
Thanks, imported (build pending buildsys/devel working again).
--
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact.
17 years, 11 months
[Bug 188430] Review Request: gtk+
by Red Hat Bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.
Summary: Review Request: gtk+
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=188430
ville.skytta(a)iki.fi changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
AssignedTo|bugzilla-sink(a)leemhuis.info |ville.skytta(a)iki.fi
OtherBugsDependingO|163776 |163779
nThis| |
------- Additional Comments From ville.skytta(a)iki.fi 2006-05-04 11:42 EST -------
Yep, approved, I just wanted to make sure I understand what the no-undefined
patch is for.
--
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact.
17 years, 11 months
[Bug 188430] Review Request: gtk+
by Red Hat Bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.
Summary: Review Request: gtk+
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=188430
------- Additional Comments From rdieter(a)math.unl.edu 2006-05-04 08:39 EST -------
Re: no-undefined patch. You're right. It's just to guarantee no future goofs.
Re: glib undefined symbols... hmm... I thought I had checked that, but it
appears I only checked libglib, not the others. Should be easy enough to fix.
Are we a go here then (APPROVED)?
--
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact.
17 years, 11 months