This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: http://reviewboard-openlmi.rhcloud.com/r/1285/

On November 28th, 2013, 9:05 a.m. CET, Jan Safranek wrote:

openlmi-providers.spec (Diff revision 1)
27
%global storage_version 0.7.0
28
%global nw_version 0.2.1
This will force us to bump and rebuild openlmi-providers after any bugfix update of storage or networking providers. Do we really want to depend on them so tightly?

On November 28th, 2013, 9:15 a.m. CET, Radek Novacek wrote:

I agree, it would be better if providers can do bugfix releases independently and OpenLMI meta-release would only enforce some minor releases.

I don't see any benefit in strict requirement to some bugfix version.
What about "Requires: openlmi-storage >= 0.7 && openlmi-storage < 0.8" ?

- Jan


On November 25th, 2013, 5:17 p.m. CET, Stephen Gallagher wrote:

Review request for OpenLMI Developers.
By Stephen Gallagher.

Updated Nov. 25, 2013, 5:17 p.m.

Repository: openlmi-providers

Description

Define OpenLMI 1.0.0

Set strict version dependencies for the meta-package

Testing

Built the package, verified that the resulting openlmi meta-package has:

openlmi-account = 0.4.1-3.fc21
openlmi-hardware = 0.4.1-3.fc21
openlmi-networking = 0.2.1
openlmi-powermanagement = 0.4.1-3.fc21
openlmi-providers = 1.0.0-3.fc21
openlmi-service = 0.4.1-3.fc21
openlmi-software = 0.4.1-3.fc21
openlmi-storage = 0.7.0
rpmlib(CompressedFileNames) <= 3.0.4-1
rpmlib(FileDigests) <= 4.6.0-1
rpmlib(PayloadFilesHavePrefix) <= 4.0-1
tog-pegasus
rpmlib(PayloadIsXz) <= 5.2-1

Diffs

  • openlmi-providers.spec (aa2225fcac396ac49ffad95c99a9241e5825dda1)

View Diff