On 10/04/2013 05:49 PM, Stephen Gallagher wrote:
Do I understand correctly that this will be effectively an internal-only change (from the perspective of people consuming only OpenLMI interfaces)? i.e. tests written against openlmi-storage or openlmi-account wouldn't need to be updated?
Good question. All SMI-S use cases start with 'Find CIM_ComputerSystem representing the storage system' and 'find services XYZ using UVW association'. In reality, I doubt anyone finds services and other useful objects this way - at least in our scripts we just directly enumerate LMI_XYZService instances, there is no need to traverse through CIM_ComputerSystem.
If we take our scripts as example usage, the change to PG_ComputerSystem won't break anything.
Jan