On Mon, Sep 14, 2009 at 12:24:18AM -0400, Paul Fox wrote:
martin wrote:
> Sayamindu, rwh, and Team OLPC,
>
> Please reconsider the resolution of
>
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=514081 . Currently
> the resolution of this bug -- moving the file from the hal-info
> rpm to the olpc-utils rpm -- means olpc-utils must be installed
> for the 30-keymap-olpc.fdi file mapping the XO-1{,.5} keys to be
> installed.
to be clear, the resolution wasn't to move the file
Indeed...I should've said "removing the [one] file ... in favor of the
[other]".
-- there were two copies, one incorrect
To be clear, one wasn't incorrect to the point of uselessness - it was
just not as complete / correct as we would like. It was still useful,
which is why removing it is less than ideal.
but perhaps this was the wrong thing to do, for the reasons
you've
given below.
Yeah - the current situation seems like tidy-up that had an undesired
consequence, as I assume olpc-utils' .fdi file was being used in
preference to hal-info's one.
Where is the .fdi file "supposed" to live - /etc/hal/... or
/usr/share/hal/...?
paul
Martin