--- On Mon, 8/3/09, Tomeu Vizoso <tomeu(a)sugarlabs.org> wrote:
From: Tomeu Vizoso <tomeu(a)sugarlabs.org>
Subject: Re: F11 for XO1 - Fonts
To: "Yioryos Asprobounitis" <mavrothal(a)yahoo.com>
Cc: "Daniel Drake" <dsd(a)laptop.org>, fedora-olpc-list(a)redhat.com
Date: Monday, August 3, 2009, 8:16 AM
On Mon, Aug 3, 2009 at 12:46, Yioryos
Asprobounitis<mavrothal(a)yahoo.com>
wrote:
>
>
>
> --- On Mon, 8/3/09, Daniel Drake <dsd(a)laptop.org>
wrote:
>
>> From: Daniel Drake <dsd(a)laptop.org>
>> Subject: Re: F11 for XO1 - Fonts
>> To: "Tomeu Vizoso" <tomeu(a)sugarlabs.org>
>> Cc: "Yioryos Asprobounitis" <mavrothal(a)yahoo.com>,
fedora-olpc-list(a)redhat.com
>> Date: Monday, August 3, 2009, 6:17 AM
>> 2009/8/3 Tomeu Vizoso <tomeu(a)sugarlabs.org>:
>> > It's not really hardcoded in the journal, it
uses the
>> default Sugar
>> > font that happens to be 10.
>>
>> On the XO the default is changed to 7, so it seems
like
>> there's a bug
>> somewhere. Yioryos, perhaps you could file that
ticket?
>>
>> Thanks,
>> Daniel
>>
>
> I did.
> But I can see a pattern I was afraid of.
> OLPC devs will say is a Sugar issue and SugarLabs devs
that is an OLPC_specific-build issue...
Different people working on different software components
means that
some effort is needed to work together.
The people?... :-)
> Just someone tell me what the damn relevant files
might be and I'll see if I can wrestle with them.
With the information I have, it could be in lots of files.
Will try to
find time to give it a look soon.
Thanks,
Thank you. Ticket number is #1125
Tomeu
>
>
>