On Fri, 2010-03-26 at 01:10 -0700, Yioryos Asprobounitis wrote:
I really think that the Gnome desktop is a valuable addition for
the XO but mostly for the end user. Is not a coincidence that
people use it. So openness and robustness should be implemented
there too.
If the problem is the video driver for example, this is what it
should be fixed, not hampering its use.
You mean the blacked out GTK buttons and corrupt graphics in some web
pages? We have a temporary workaround for these now!
I can see blocking as a temp measure but only in combination
with an increased gnome-bug-fixing priority.
Sounds right, but I'm not sure *who* is going to put their time into it.
My goal is to make Sugar rock, therefore I consciously chose not to let
myself distracted by Gnome support issues.
I told the "formadores" that bugs affecting Gnome are not going to be
considered at this time.
Any user can mess-up its installation. Let's not forget that
the usual "fixing" for sugar is... reflashing. But here we are
talking bugs/inadequacies. Bug-fixing should be the way, instead
of blocking features and Sugar-robustness claims.
I agree here too.
--
// Bernie Innocenti -
http://codewiz.org/
\X/ Sugar Labs -
http://sugarlabs.org/