Hi,
could someone lend a hand reviewing these two packages?
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=551411 https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=545039
Thanks,
Tomeu
On Wed, Jan 6, 2010 at 7:16 PM, Tomeu Vizoso tomeu@sugarlabs.org wrote:
Hi,
could someone lend a hand reviewing these two packages?
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=551411 https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=545039
I was going to look at the xulrunner one tomorrow if it hadn't been looked at by then. I have concerns about the OS builder one as it includes 3rd party repos which is against Fedora policy.
Peter
On Wed, Jan 06, 2010 at 07:20:23PM +0000, Peter Robinson wrote:
I have concerns about the OS builder one as it includes 3rd party repos which is against Fedora policy.
Could you point me at that policy please? I've had a look, and the closest I could find was:
http://infrastructure.fedoraproject.org/csi/free-software-policy/en-US/html-...
On Wed, Jan 6, 2010 at 8:07 PM, James Cameron quozl@laptop.org wrote:
On Wed, Jan 06, 2010 at 07:20:23PM +0000, Peter Robinson wrote:
I have concerns about the OS builder one as it includes 3rd party repos which is against Fedora policy.
Could you point me at that policy please? I've had a look, and the closest I could find was:
http://infrastructure.fedoraproject.org/csi/free-software-policy/en-US/html-...
I'm not sure that there is one directly but they've never allowed the inclusion of say rpmfusion, or any sort of linking to it, and being outside of the project's control there's obviously no way to enforce their other policies. I've added a blocker on fe-legal to confirm what the policy is.
Peter
2010/1/6 Peter Robinson pbrobinson@gmail.com:
I was going to look at the xulrunner one tomorrow if it hadn't been looked at by then. I have concerns about the OS builder one as it includes 3rd party repos which is against Fedora policy.
What does that mean? It doesn't install any files into /etc/yum.repos.d
Daniel
On Wed, Jan 6, 2010 at 8:17 PM, Daniel Drake dsd@laptop.org wrote:
2010/1/6 Peter Robinson pbrobinson@gmail.com:
I was going to look at the xulrunner one tomorrow if it hadn't been looked at by then. I have concerns about the OS builder one as it includes 3rd party repos which is against Fedora policy.
What does that mean? It doesn't install any files into /etc/yum.repos.d
No but it refers to a repo in mock.laptopp.org
Peter
On Wed, Jan 6, 2010 at 8:20 PM, Peter Robinson pbrobinson@gmail.com wrote:
On Wed, Jan 6, 2010 at 8:17 PM, Daniel Drake dsd@laptop.org wrote:
2010/1/6 Peter Robinson pbrobinson@gmail.com:
I was going to look at the xulrunner one tomorrow if it hadn't been looked at by then. I have concerns about the OS builder one as it includes 3rd party repos which is against Fedora policy.
What does that mean? It doesn't install any files into /etc/yum.repos.d
No but it refers to a repo in mock.laptopp.org
To note, I'm not against this necessarily but I want it confirmed by Fedora Legal.
Peter