Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
Summary: ocaml-docs doesn't install info files because using wrong args to install-info
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=531206
Summary: ocaml-docs doesn't install info files because using wrong args to install-info Product: Red Hat Enterprise Linux 6 Version: 6.0 Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: low Component: ocaml AssignedTo: rjones@redhat.com ReportedBy: rjones@redhat.com CC: gemi@bluewin.ch, rjones@redhat.com, fedora-ocaml-list@redhat.com Depends on: 531204 Classification: Red Hat Target Release: --- Clone Of: 531204
+++ This bug was initially created as a clone of Bug #531204 +++
Description of problem:
Although ocaml-docs comes with info files, these are never installed because we call /sbin/install-info with old-style Debian args, and install-info doesn't really work properly when you use those.
Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable):
ocaml-docs-3.11.1-4.fc13.x86_64 and all previous versions
How reproducible:
Always.
Steps to Reproduce: 1. Install ocaml. 2. Run 'info' or 'info ocaml' 3.
Actual results:
When running 'info' you'll see the OCaml page is missing from the info directory.
When running 'info ocaml' you'll see the man page which is the info fallback position when it thinks that there is no info file installed.
Expected results:
Should show real OCaml info page. Should be in directory.
Additional info:
The correct parameters which install ocaml.info are:
/sbin/install-info --entry="* ocaml: (ocaml). The Objective Caml compiler and programming environment" --section="Programming" /usr/share/info/ocaml.info /usr/share/info/dir
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=531206
Bug 531206 depends on bug 531204, which changed state.
Bug 531204 Summary: ocaml-docs doesn't install info files because using wrong args to install-info https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=531204
What |Old Value |New Value ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |CLOSED Resolution| |RAWHIDE
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=531206
--- Comment #2 from Richard W.M. Jones rjones@redhat.com 2009-10-27 06:24:12 EDT --- The fix for this is a very trivial change to the spec file, which I've verified correct in Fedora:
http://cvs.fedoraproject.org/viewvc/devel/ocaml/ocaml.spec?r1=1.61&r2=1....
Do I need to get ACKs at this stage before I make changes to RHEL 6 packages?
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=531206
--- Comment #3 from RHEL Product and Program Management pm-rhel@redhat.com 2009-10-27 06:24:20 EDT --- This request was evaluated by Red Hat Product Management for inclusion in a Red Hat Enterprise Linux major release. Product Management has requested further review of this request by Red Hat Engineering, for potential inclusion in a Red Hat Enterprise Linux Major release. This request is not yet committed for inclusion.
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=531206
Marian Ganisin mganisin@redhat.com changed:
What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Blocks| |582286
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=531206
--- Comment #5 from RHEL Product and Program Management pm-rhel@redhat.com 2010-07-15 10:23:09 EDT --- This issue has been proposed when we are only considering blocker issues in the current Red Hat Enterprise Linux release. It has been denied for the current Red Hat Enterprise Linux release.
** If you would still like this issue considered for the current release, ask your support representative to file as a blocker on your behalf. Otherwise ask that it be considered for the next Red Hat Enterprise Linux release. **
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=531206
Radek Bíba rbiba@redhat.com changed:
What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |CLOSED Resolution| |CURRENTRELEASE Last Closed| |2010-08-18 08:52:05
ocaml-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org