rpms/ocaml-camlimages/devel ocaml-camlimages.spec,1.14,1.15
by Karsten Hopp
Author: karsten
Update of /cvs/extras/rpms/ocaml-camlimages/devel
In directory cvs1.fedora.phx.redhat.com:/tmp/cvs-serv8767/ocaml-camlimages/devel
Modified Files:
ocaml-camlimages.spec
Log Message:
- ExcludeArch sparc64, s390, s390x as we don't have OCaml on those archs
(added sparc64 per request from the sparc maintainer)
Index: ocaml-camlimages.spec
===================================================================
RCS file: /cvs/extras/rpms/ocaml-camlimages/devel/ocaml-camlimages.spec,v
retrieving revision 1.14
retrieving revision 1.15
diff -u -r1.14 -r1.15
--- ocaml-camlimages.spec 26 Feb 2009 06:51:27 -0000 1.14
+++ ocaml-camlimages.spec 16 Apr 2009 09:06:02 -0000 1.15
@@ -13,6 +13,7 @@
Source0: http://gallium.inria.fr/camlimages/camlimages-%{version}.tar.gz
Source1: camlimages-2.2.0-htmlref.tar.gz
BuildRoot: %{_tmppath}/%{name}-%{version}-%{release}-root-%(%{__id_u} -n)
+ExcludeArch: sparc64 s390 s390x
Patch0: camlimages-3.0.1-display-module.patch
@@ -107,6 +108,10 @@
%changelog
+* Thu Apr 16 2009 S390x secondary arch maintainer <fedora-s390x(a)lists.fedoraproject.org>
+- ExcludeArch sparc64, s390, s390x as we don't have OCaml on those archs
+ (added sparc64 per request from the sparc maintainer)
+
* Wed Feb 25 2009 Fedora Release Engineering <rel-eng(a)lists.fedoraproject.org> - 3.0.1-7
- Rebuilt for https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Fedora_11_Mass_Rebuild
15 years
rpms/ocaml-camlp5/devel ocaml-camlp5.spec,1.7,1.8
by Karsten Hopp
Author: karsten
Update of /cvs/extras/rpms/ocaml-camlp5/devel
In directory cvs1.fedora.phx.redhat.com:/tmp/cvs-serv8767/ocaml-camlp5/devel
Modified Files:
ocaml-camlp5.spec
Log Message:
- ExcludeArch sparc64, s390, s390x as we don't have OCaml on those archs
(added sparc64 per request from the sparc maintainer)
Index: ocaml-camlp5.spec
===================================================================
RCS file: /cvs/extras/rpms/ocaml-camlp5/devel/ocaml-camlp5.spec,v
retrieving revision 1.7
retrieving revision 1.8
diff -u -r1.7 -r1.8
--- ocaml-camlp5.spec 26 Feb 2009 06:52:26 -0000 1.7
+++ ocaml-camlp5.spec 16 Apr 2009 09:06:02 -0000 1.8
@@ -12,6 +12,7 @@
Source0: http://pauillac.inria.fr/~ddr/camlp5/distrib/src/camlp5-%{version}.tgz
Source1: camlp5-META
BuildRoot: %{_tmppath}/%{name}-%{version}-%{release}-root-%(%{__id_u} -n)
+ExcludeArch: sparc64 s390 s390x
BuildRequires: ocaml >= 3.10.1, ocaml-ocamldoc
@@ -99,6 +100,10 @@
%changelog
+* Thu Apr 16 2009 S390x secondary arch maintainer <fedora-s390x(a)lists.fedoraproject.org>
+- ExcludeArch sparc64, s390, s390x as we don't have OCaml on those archs
+ (added sparc64 per request from the sparc maintainer)
+
* Wed Feb 25 2009 Fedora Release Engineering <rel-eng(a)lists.fedoraproject.org> - 5.10-3
- Rebuilt for https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Fedora_11_Mass_Rebuild
15 years
rpms/ocaml-calendar/devel ocaml-calendar.spec,1.11,1.12
by Karsten Hopp
Author: karsten
Update of /cvs/extras/rpms/ocaml-calendar/devel
In directory cvs1.fedora.phx.redhat.com:/tmp/cvs-serv8767/ocaml-calendar/devel
Modified Files:
ocaml-calendar.spec
Log Message:
- ExcludeArch sparc64, s390, s390x as we don't have OCaml on those archs
(added sparc64 per request from the sparc maintainer)
Index: ocaml-calendar.spec
===================================================================
RCS file: /cvs/extras/rpms/ocaml-calendar/devel/ocaml-calendar.spec,v
retrieving revision 1.11
retrieving revision 1.12
diff -u -r1.11 -r1.12
--- ocaml-calendar.spec 26 Feb 2009 06:49:20 -0000 1.11
+++ ocaml-calendar.spec 16 Apr 2009 09:06:01 -0000 1.12
@@ -11,6 +11,7 @@
URL: http://www.lri.fr/~signoles/prog.en.html#calendar
Source0: http://www.lri.fr/~signoles/prog/calendar/calendar-%{version}.tar.gz
BuildRoot: %{_tmppath}/%{name}-%{version}-%{release}-root-%(%{__id_u} -n)
+ExcludeArch: sparc64 s390 s390x
BuildRequires: ocaml >= 3.10.1
BuildRequires: ocaml-findlib-devel, ocaml-ocamldoc
@@ -82,6 +83,10 @@
%changelog
+* Thu Apr 16 2009 S390x secondary arch maintainer <fedora-s390x(a)lists.fedoraproject.org>
+- ExcludeArch sparc64, s390, s390x as we don't have OCaml on those archs
+ (added sparc64 per request from the sparc maintainer)
+
* Wed Feb 25 2009 Fedora Release Engineering <rel-eng(a)lists.fedoraproject.org> - 2.0.4-4
- Rebuilt for https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Fedora_11_Mass_Rebuild
15 years
rpms/ocaml-camlidl/devel ocaml-camlidl.spec,1.6,1.7
by Karsten Hopp
Author: karsten
Update of /cvs/extras/rpms/ocaml-camlidl/devel
In directory cvs1.fedora.phx.redhat.com:/tmp/cvs-serv8767/ocaml-camlidl/devel
Modified Files:
ocaml-camlidl.spec
Log Message:
- ExcludeArch sparc64, s390, s390x as we don't have OCaml on those archs
(added sparc64 per request from the sparc maintainer)
Index: ocaml-camlidl.spec
===================================================================
RCS file: /cvs/extras/rpms/ocaml-camlidl/devel/ocaml-camlidl.spec,v
retrieving revision 1.6
retrieving revision 1.7
diff -u -r1.6 -r1.7
--- ocaml-camlidl.spec 26 Feb 2009 06:50:20 -0000 1.6
+++ ocaml-camlidl.spec 16 Apr 2009 09:06:02 -0000 1.7
@@ -12,6 +12,7 @@
Source0: http://caml.inria.fr/pub/old_caml_site/distrib/bazar-ocaml/camlidl-%{vers...
Source1: http://caml.inria.fr/pub/old_caml_site/distrib/bazar-ocaml/camlidl-%{vers...
BuildRoot: %{_tmppath}/%{name}-%{version}-%{release}-root-%(%{__id_u} -n)
+ExcludeArch: sparc64 s390 s390x
BuildRequires: ocaml
BuildRequires: ocaml-ocamldoc
@@ -99,6 +100,10 @@
%changelog
+* Thu Apr 16 2009 S390x secondary arch maintainer <fedora-s390x(a)lists.fedoraproject.org>
+- ExcludeArch sparc64, s390, s390x as we don't have OCaml on those archs
+ (added sparc64 per request from the sparc maintainer)
+
* Wed Feb 25 2009 Fedora Release Engineering <rel-eng(a)lists.fedoraproject.org> - 1.05-8
- Rebuilt for https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Fedora_11_Mass_Rebuild
15 years
rpms/ocaml-bitstring/devel ocaml-bitstring.spec,1.10,1.11
by Karsten Hopp
Author: karsten
Update of /cvs/extras/rpms/ocaml-bitstring/devel
In directory cvs1.fedora.phx.redhat.com:/tmp/cvs-serv8767/ocaml-bitstring/devel
Modified Files:
ocaml-bitstring.spec
Log Message:
- ExcludeArch sparc64, s390, s390x as we don't have OCaml on those archs
(added sparc64 per request from the sparc maintainer)
Index: ocaml-bitstring.spec
===================================================================
RCS file: /cvs/extras/rpms/ocaml-bitstring/devel/ocaml-bitstring.spec,v
retrieving revision 1.10
retrieving revision 1.11
diff -u -r1.10 -r1.11
--- ocaml-bitstring.spec 26 Feb 2009 06:47:27 -0000 1.10
+++ ocaml-bitstring.spec 16 Apr 2009 09:06:01 -0000 1.11
@@ -22,6 +22,7 @@
Patch1: ocaml-bitstring-2.0.0-dynlink.patch
BuildRoot: %{_tmppath}/%{name}-%{version}-%{release}-root-%(%{__id_u} -n)
+ExcludeArch: sparc64 s390 s390x
BuildRequires: ocaml >= 3.10.2
BuildRequires: ocaml-findlib-devel
@@ -184,6 +185,10 @@
%changelog
+* Thu Apr 16 2009 S390x secondary arch maintainer <fedora-s390x(a)lists.fedoraproject.org>
+- ExcludeArch sparc64, s390, s390x as we don't have OCaml on those archs
+ (added sparc64 per request from the sparc maintainer)
+
* Wed Feb 25 2009 Fedora Release Engineering <rel-eng(a)lists.fedoraproject.org> - 2.0.0-8
- Rebuilt for https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Fedora_11_Mass_Rebuild
15 years
rpms/ocaml-cairo/devel ocaml-cairo.spec,1.9,1.10
by Karsten Hopp
Author: karsten
Update of /cvs/extras/rpms/ocaml-cairo/devel
In directory cvs1.fedora.phx.redhat.com:/tmp/cvs-serv8767/ocaml-cairo/devel
Modified Files:
ocaml-cairo.spec
Log Message:
- ExcludeArch sparc64, s390, s390x as we don't have OCaml on those archs
(added sparc64 per request from the sparc maintainer)
Index: ocaml-cairo.spec
===================================================================
RCS file: /cvs/extras/rpms/ocaml-cairo/devel/ocaml-cairo.spec,v
retrieving revision 1.9
retrieving revision 1.10
diff -u -r1.9 -r1.10
--- ocaml-cairo.spec 26 Feb 2009 06:48:22 -0000 1.9
+++ ocaml-cairo.spec 16 Apr 2009 09:06:01 -0000 1.10
@@ -22,6 +22,7 @@
Source0: ocaml-cairo-%{version}.tar.gz
Source1: ocaml-cairo-META
BuildRoot: %{_tmppath}/%{name}-%{version}-%{release}-root-%(%{__id_u} -n)
+ExcludeArch: sparc64 s390 s390x
BuildRequires: ocaml >= 3.10.0
BuildRequires: ocaml-findlib-devel
@@ -118,6 +119,10 @@
%changelog
+* Thu Apr 16 2009 S390x secondary arch maintainer <fedora-s390x(a)lists.fedoraproject.org>
+- ExcludeArch sparc64, s390, s390x as we don't have OCaml on those archs
+ (added sparc64 per request from the sparc maintainer)
+
* Wed Feb 25 2009 Fedora Release Engineering <rel-eng(a)lists.fedoraproject.org> - 1.2.0.cvs20080301-8
- Rebuilt for https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Fedora_11_Mass_Rebuild
15 years
rpms/ocaml-bisect/devel ocaml-bisect.spec,1.4,1.5
by Karsten Hopp
Author: karsten
Update of /cvs/extras/rpms/ocaml-bisect/devel
In directory cvs1.fedora.phx.redhat.com:/tmp/cvs-serv8767/ocaml-bisect/devel
Modified Files:
ocaml-bisect.spec
Log Message:
- ExcludeArch sparc64, s390, s390x as we don't have OCaml on those archs
(added sparc64 per request from the sparc maintainer)
Index: ocaml-bisect.spec
===================================================================
RCS file: /cvs/extras/rpms/ocaml-bisect/devel/ocaml-bisect.spec,v
retrieving revision 1.4
retrieving revision 1.5
diff -u -r1.4 -r1.5
--- ocaml-bisect.spec 26 Feb 2009 06:46:32 -0000 1.4
+++ ocaml-bisect.spec 16 Apr 2009 09:06:01 -0000 1.5
@@ -14,6 +14,7 @@
URL: http://bisect.x9c.fr/
Source0: http://bisect.x9c.fr/distrib/bisect-%{mainversion}-%{subversion}.tar.gz
BuildRoot: %{_tmppath}/%{name}-%{version}-%{release}-root-%(%{__id_u} -n)
+ExcludeArch: sparc64 s390 s390x
Patch0: bisect-1.0-alpha-nojava.patch
@@ -96,6 +97,10 @@
%changelog
+* Thu Apr 16 2009 S390x secondary arch maintainer <fedora-s390x(a)lists.fedoraproject.org>
+- ExcludeArch sparc64, s390, s390x as we don't have OCaml on those archs
+ (added sparc64 per request from the sparc maintainer)
+
* Wed Feb 25 2009 Fedora Release Engineering <rel-eng(a)lists.fedoraproject.org> - 1.0-0.4.alpha
- Rebuilt for https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Fedora_11_Mass_Rebuild
15 years
rpms/ocaml-augeas/devel ocaml-augeas.spec,1.4,1.5
by Karsten Hopp
Author: karsten
Update of /cvs/extras/rpms/ocaml-augeas/devel
In directory cvs1.fedora.phx.redhat.com:/tmp/cvs-serv8767/ocaml-augeas/devel
Modified Files:
ocaml-augeas.spec
Log Message:
- ExcludeArch sparc64, s390, s390x as we don't have OCaml on those archs
(added sparc64 per request from the sparc maintainer)
Index: ocaml-augeas.spec
===================================================================
RCS file: /cvs/extras/rpms/ocaml-augeas/devel/ocaml-augeas.spec,v
retrieving revision 1.4
retrieving revision 1.5
diff -u -r1.4 -r1.5
--- ocaml-augeas.spec 26 Feb 2009 06:45:38 -0000 1.4
+++ ocaml-augeas.spec 16 Apr 2009 09:06:00 -0000 1.5
@@ -11,6 +11,7 @@
URL: http://et.redhat.com/~rjones/augeas/files/
Source0: http://et.redhat.com/~rjones/augeas/files/%{name}-%{version}.tar.gz
BuildRoot: %{_tmppath}/%{name}-%{version}-%{release}-root-%(%{__id_u} -n)
+ExcludeArch: sparc64 s390 s390x
BuildRequires: ocaml >= 3.09.0
BuildRequires: ocaml-findlib-devel
@@ -94,6 +95,10 @@
%changelog
+* Thu Apr 16 2009 S390x secondary arch maintainer <fedora-s390x(a)lists.fedoraproject.org>
+- ExcludeArch sparc64, s390, s390x as we don't have OCaml on those archs
+ (added sparc64 per request from the sparc maintainer)
+
* Wed Feb 25 2009 Fedora Release Engineering <rel-eng(a)lists.fedoraproject.org> - 0.4-4
- Rebuilt for https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Fedora_11_Mass_Rebuild
15 years
Thank You !
by Tom Hutchinson
I just wanted to say thank you.
I'm a Mac user actually. However at work, my workstation has Fedora.
My experience doing OCaml development on each platforms has been
pretty different. Getting ocaml packages to install on the mac has
been night and day compared to fedora. On the mac I use MacPorts/fink/
compile-by-hand. It's a huge pain.
GODI is great. It doesn't integrate with non-ocaml software though.
This leads to problems.
Compiling everything by hand was working very well actually. That is
until I wanted to use lablgtk2. Compiling gtk2 (and depencies) by hand
is not so fun.
Being able to simply "yum install ocaml" is so refreshing. This ease
of use on the end-user side is clearly the result of a lot of effort.
That's why I wanted to say thanks. Richard Jones in particular
deserves a lot of appreciation.
Tom
15 years