nodejs February 2015

nodejs@lists.fedoraproject.org

6 participants
3 discussions

multi-version nodejs-colors for nodejs-cli-table
by Piotr Popieluch 24 Feb '15

24 Feb '15

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 Hi, I'm reviewing Ralph's nodejs-cli-table [1]. The module depends on nodejs-colors 1.0.3. Fixdep doesn't work as the module uses new features introduced in 1.0.0. Updrading colors 0.6.2 to 1.0.3 will break all the depending packages, see below. What would be wise to do? Update all dependents or multiversion nodejs-colors. What needs to be done to have colors multiversioned? [1]: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1191212 for line in $(repoquery --whatrequires 'npm(colors)'); do echo ${line}: repoquery -R ${line} | grep colors; echo done nodejs-dtree-0:0.0.7-1.fc21.noarch: npm(colors) < 0.7 npm(colors) >= 0.6.2 nodejs-grunt-0:0.4.4-4.fc21.noarch: npm(colors) < 1 npm(colors) >= 0.6 nodejs-grunt-html-validation-0:0.1.18-2.fc21.noarch: npm(colors) npm(colors) < 0.7 npm(colors) >= 0.6.0 nodejs-grunt-init-0:0.3.1-2.fc21.noarch: npm(colors) < 1 npm(colors) >= 0.6 nodejs-grunt-saucelabs-0:8.3.3-1.fc21.noarch: npm(colors) < 0.7 npm(colors) >= 0.6.2 nodejs-node-static-0:0.7.3-2.fc21.noarch: npm(colors) >= 0.6.0 nodejs-replace-0:0.3.0-2.fc21.noarch: npm(colors) nodejs-winston-0:0.7.3-2.fc21.noarch: npm(colors) < 0.7 npm(colors) >= 0.6 -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1 iQIcBAEBAgAGBQJU51TKAAoJEPHEApzE46n59cUP/35/IT0D4WcGKcOatyXmdqaV UCDOk3E6+D0+3rmeVVwnFQpxWUzmMfriSvkxI/vLzuciMYyz1SBrK/D8tGZwMx0J HwR00npkhzI7vi0COeOvKHvgXJfO4jk85q5sMkTfRRjk0HquRddy1FShK67jRTzb Li20g0OtNRYqwsaMczcJF6RyP8txhfsFZsyop8xxF0EmmniPD3wWV01AZAgzBJcc nnjtA09ehuq3RQXdkNLKyvSMBVfEfcJS8+oXIPwzvMnOCFatOrorelZHB61lqPXw Bb6BV9TriZmMlXeMTUNqcntNSML7fJt7oAqXDqOH+ifsjsqmgNZbQDPQ/m+81hIM MmQLeG+f+4XOqapi3FsLAwFIrHp16ZRHWng+ZOy0B0IBg2BXo7JK5nQDYAElqcpm fOVKjaeEsjt0Gil8B1FjZkhuTcOKu7IqomtZGzzgUiZrmO99MAXn1mGYHDHA6T2g eZoWEwVkJDe5mE+HKMN74TsXJxRb23a78Nb5gwTJYsDIMrTPLVSj64egl9/i3o+0 dHFzT6uL13Ri8LxaPwHE/tFWwCQONLK3jxQuwj0++DzikN9weCen4CfgLbKEN30J gnpOEm0UpbhASAt9sGCwpmZM3wfV8RSxiURjd1ijwcGiWERfIEPn6qnBSHGBv7dz oTqh28SZGhMBehA375yI =OJEw -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

3 4

Review request - nodejs-ultron
by Troy Dawson 13 Feb '15

13 Feb '15

Hello, I need a package review on nodejs-ultron. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1188763 The newer nodejs-ws depends on this package. If someone needs a review swap, I would gladly do that. Thanks Troy Dawson

2 1

nodejs-ws - should I change it to a noarch
by Troy Dawson 04 Feb '15

04 Feb '15

Hi All, I was going through, updating my nodejs package for rawhide (f22) when I found the nodejs-ws went from binary to pure javascript with version 0.7.1. So, my question is this. Do I continue to leave it as an arch, so I don't break thing, so should I go to noarch. Switching from an arch to a noarch has bitten me in the past when people do updates. I don't know if that is still the case. What are people's thoughts. Should I switch it to a noarch? I'm not planning on backporting this to older distributions if that matters in the decision. Thanks Troy Dawson p.s. Side note - This update also requires nodejs-ultron, if anyone wants to do a review request. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1188763 p.p.s. If there is already a fedora page explaining arch to noarch policies, that would be great. Feel free to point me to it.

2 2

2024

2023

2022

2021

2020

2019

2018

2017

2016

2015

2014

2013

nodejs February 2015