Hi, there are some audio applications that need a bit of wider testing. Please add a comment in bodhi for the packages and thumbs up/down as appropriate:
rakarrack-0.5.8: rawhide https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/rakarrack-0.5.8-2.fc13 https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/rakarrack-0.5.8-2.fc12 EL-6
audacity-1.3.12-0.4.beta: rawhide https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/audacity-1.3.12-0.4.beta.fc13 https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/audacity-1.3.12-0.4.beta.fc12 EL-6 (freshly built)
Thanks for your assistance, David.
On Thu, Jul 15, 2010 at 6:35 AM, David Timms dtimms@iinet.net.au wrote:
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/rakarrack-0.5.8-2.fc12 https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/audacity-1.3.12-0.4.beta.fc12
That's a double "worksforme"!! Thanks for making the latest rakarrack available on Fedora!
Is there any way audacity, qtractor, and other liblame-needing apps could "dynamically load" that library if it is present and installed from RPMFUSION, so as to automatically enable their mp3 functionality w/o a separate compile? (As opposed to the current situation of having an up-to-date fedora package and an out-of-date "freeworld" package that supports MP3.)
Niels http://nielsmayer.com
On Thu, 15 Jul 2010 10:42:29 -0700, Niels wrote:
Is there any way audacity, qtractor, and other liblame-needing apps could "dynamically load" that library if it is present and installed from RPMFUSION, so as to automatically enable their mp3 functionality w/o a separate compile? (As opposed to the current situation of having an up-to-date fedora package and an out-of-date "freeworld" package that supports MP3.)
Hi David
Many thanks for actual audacity and rakarrack versions.
Out of curosity are there any particular reasons for not using twolame and disabling ffmpeg in Audacity?
I have built my own rpm for fc12 x86_64 from your srpm with mp3 support and will be testing this shortly.
With best regards, Simon
Am 15.07.2010 15:35, schrieb David Timms:
Hi, there are some audio applications that need a bit of wider testing. Please add a comment in bodhi for the packages and thumbs up/down as appropriate:
rakarrack-0.5.8: rawhide https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/rakarrack-0.5.8-2.fc13 https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/rakarrack-0.5.8-2.fc12 EL-6
audacity-1.3.12-0.4.beta: rawhide https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/audacity-1.3.12-0.4.beta.fc13 https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/audacity-1.3.12-0.4.beta.fc12 EL-6 (freshly built)
Thanks for your assistance, David. _______________________________________________ music mailing list music@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/music
On 17/07/10 01:09, Simon Lewis wrote: ...
Many thanks for actual audacity and rakarrack versions.
Out of curiosity are there any particular reasons for not using twolame and disabling ffmpeg in Audacity?
Firstly, our guidelines require that when an upstream source archive includes third party libraries, access to these internal libraries must be disabled and the package instead (Build)Require the separately packaged external library: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/Guidelines#Duplication_of_system_libraries
ffmpeg: can't be in fedora, therefore we can't require it. http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Forbidden_items#DVD_Playback
twolame: this seems to be an alternative to libmad. However, neither can be included in a Fedora build: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Forbidden_items#MP3_Support
ffmpeg and libmad are enabled at the rpmfusion.org build.
Meanwhile, I would appreciate results of testing you did in the bodhi comments, with a thumbs up or down depending on what you found ;-)
{thanks to our other music@fp.org users who have provided comments so far}, David Timms.
Hi David
Thanks for your quick response - not a technical issue then.
I can build audacity on x86_64 with %__make %{?_smp_mflags} - yet in the spec file it is noted that "_smp_mflags cause problems" - is this platform specific?
Anyway, positive karma for the x86_64 on bodhi.
With best regards, Simon
Am 17.07.2010 01:33, schrieb David Timms:
On 17/07/10 01:09, Simon Lewis wrote: ...
Many thanks for actual audacity and rakarrack versions.
Out of curiosity are there any particular reasons for not using twolame and disabling ffmpeg in Audacity?
Firstly, our guidelines require that when an upstream source archive includes third party libraries, access to these internal libraries must be disabled and the package instead (Build)Require the separately packaged external library: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/Guidelines#Duplication_of_system_libraries
ffmpeg: can't be in fedora, therefore we can't require it. http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Forbidden_items#DVD_Playback
twolame: this seems to be an alternative to libmad. However, neither can be included in a Fedora build: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Forbidden_items#MP3_Support
ffmpeg and libmad are enabled at the rpmfusion.org build.
Meanwhile, I would appreciate results of testing you did in the bodhi comments, with a thumbs up or down depending on what you found ;-)
{thanks to our other music@fp.org users who have provided comments so far}, David Timms. _______________________________________________ music mailing list music@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/music