It is hard to decide... As N32 is not purely 32bit, and N64 shares the same arch (mips64el) with N32. But mipsel is obviously for O32.
Cheers, Fai
2010/7/13 Xin Zhen xlonestar2000@aim.com:
在 2010-07-06二的 15:06 +0800,Gerard Braad写道:
Hello,
Questions
We still have an issue to which we would like your advice. We are currently building our distribution as N32 for MIPS Little Endian (mipsel), but this is not reflected in our package naming. Maybe over time we could consider creating packages for the other ABIs, like O32 and N64, or even creating a Big Endian release. We would need to be able to indicate this in our generated packages. Just let us hear what your take on this is. Feel free to forward this message to people you think can help us in making a good decision.
We would also like to know how people are using the current release and if they had any good (or maybe even bad) experience with it. Looking forward to this.
Just let you know, that the F13 rootfs boots on Yeeloong laptop yesterday evening.
And, is this an issue that the packages have name mips64el while the binaries are actually N32?
Kind regards,
Gerard and the MIPS team
mips mailing list mips@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/mips