==========================================
#fedora-blocker-review: F24-blocker-review
==========================================
Meeting started by adamw at 17:00:53 UTC. The full logs are available at
http://meetbot.fedoraproject.org/fedora-blocker-review/2016-02-15/f24-blo...
.
Meeting summary
---------------
* Roll Call (adamw, 17:01:01)
* Introduction (adamw, 17:03:29)
* Our purpose in this meeting is to review proposed blocker and
nice-to-have bugs and decide whether to accept them, and to monitor
the progress of fixing existing accepted blocker and nice-to-have
bugs. (adamw, 17:03:30)
* We'll be following the process outlined at: (adamw, 17:03:30)
* LINK:
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/QA:SOP_Blocker_Bug_Meeting
(adamw, 17:03:30)
* The bugs up for review today are available at: (adamw, 17:03:31)
* LINK:
http://qa.fedoraproject.org/blockerbugs/current (adamw,
17:03:35)
* The criteria for release blocking bugs can be found at: (adamw,
17:03:37)
* LINK:
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Fedora_24_Alpha_Release_Criteria
(adamw, 17:03:39)
* LINK:
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Fedora_24_Beta_Release_Criteria
(adamw, 17:03:41)
* LINK:
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Fedora_24_Final_Release_Criteria
(adamw, 17:03:43)
* 3 Proposed Final Blockers (adamw, 17:03:59)
* 2 Proposed Alpha Freeze Exceptions (adamw, 17:04:12)
* (1304681) Journal spam: Gdk-WARNING **: gdk-frame-clock: layout
continuously requested, giving up after 4 tries (adamw, 17:05:41)
* LINK:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1304681 (adamw,
17:05:42)
* Proposed Blocker, gnome-shell, NEW (adamw, 17:05:42)
* AGREED: 1304681 - punt (delay decision) - this is a difficult
judgment call and it's hard to make it with only a few (mostly QA)
folks in attendance (adamw, 17:12:42)
* (1033778) installer considers encrypted Apple Core Storage volumes as
resizeable (adamw, 17:12:50)
* LINK:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1033778 (adamw,
17:12:50)
* Proposed Blocker, python-blivet, NEW (adamw, 17:12:50)
* AGREED: 1033778 - punt (delay decision) - on the face of it we're
inclined to agree that this is a blocker, but we suspect there may
be hidden depths, so we want to discuss with anaconda devs before
making a decision (none present at meeting) (adamw, 17:21:48)
* (1306837) Anaconda's help is broken (adamw, 17:21:49)
* LINK:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1306837 (adamw,
17:21:49)
* Proposed Blocker, yelp, NEW (adamw, 17:21:49)
* AGREED: 1306837 - AcceptedBlocker (Final) - clear violation of "Any
element in the installer interface(s) which is clearly intended to
display 'help' text must do so correctly when activated." (adamw,
17:24:49)
* (1306462) _ped.PartitionException: Unable to satisfy all constraints
on the partition. (adamw, 17:24:58)
* LINK:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1306462 (adamw,
17:24:58)
* Proposed Blocker, anaconda, NEW (adamw, 17:24:58)
* AGREED: 1306462 - punt (delay decision) - it's not clear precisely
what the reporter did here (he cites the "unpartitioned space"
criterion but refers to "reclaim space" also), thus we'd like more
details and a developer response before making a determination
(adamw, 17:30:47)
* (1306808) blivet.errors.FSError: mount failed: 32 (adamw, 17:31:23)
* LINK:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1306808 (adamw,
17:31:23)
* Proposed Blocker, anaconda, NEW (adamw, 17:31:23)
* AGREED: 1253481 - punt (delay decision) - this seems a strong
candidate as there are many people hitting the 'potential dupe' bug,
but reporter did not explain precisely what he actually did, we need
that clarified to make a decision (adamw, 17:39:48)
* (1259865) call `dnf mark install <pkgs...>`on packages installed from
PK (adamw, 17:39:54)
* LINK:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1259865 (adamw,
17:39:54)
* Proposed Blocker, PackageKit, NEW (adamw, 17:39:54)
* AGREED: 1259865 - AcceptedBlocker (Beta) - we hold this violates
combination of "The installed system must be able to download and
install updates with the default console package manager." (Alpha)
and "The installed system must be able to download and install
updates with the default graphical package manager in all
release-blocking desktops." (Beta) as it's believed that doing the
former after the latter could remove critical packages (adamw,
17:48:35)
* Alpha FEs (adamw, 17:49:00)
* (1299210) No initial-setup on Fedora Rawhide 20160115 (qemu-kvm)
(adamw, 17:49:04)
* LINK:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1299210 (adamw,
17:49:04)
* Proposed Freeze Exceptions, initial-setup, MODIFIED (adamw,
17:49:04)
* actually, we're not frozen for a while, so let's skip FEs for now
(adamw, 17:51:24)
* Open floor (adamw, 17:51:35)
Meeting ended at 17:52:43 UTC.
Action Items
------------
Action Items, by person
-----------------------
* **UNASSIGNED**
* (none)
People Present (lines said)
---------------------------
* adamw (129)
* kparal (48)
* pschindl (14)
* zodbot (7)
* tflink (2)
Generated by `MeetBot`_ 0.1.4
.. _`MeetBot`:
http://wiki.debian.org/MeetBot
https://meetbot.fedoraproject.org/fedora-blocker-review/2016-02-15/f24-bl...
--
You received this message due to your preference settings at
https://apps.fedoraproject.org/notifications/fmnmeetingminutes.id.fedorap...