I filled in a gap that zodbot missed when it died in the middle of the
meeting, but these should be complete.
==========================================
#fedora-blocker-review: F22-blocker-review
==========================================
Meeting started by roshi at 16:06:42 UTC. The full logs are available at
http://meetbot.fedoraproject.org/fedora-blocker-review/2015-01-12/f22-blo...
.
Meeting summary
---------------
* Roll Call (roshi, 16:06:43)
* Introduction (roshi, 16:08:49)
* Our purpose in this meeting is to review proposed blocker and
nice-to-have bugs and decide whether to accept them, and to monitor
the progress of fixing existing accepted blocker and nice-to-have
bugs. (roshi, 16:08:49)
* We'll be following the process outlined at: (roshi, 16:08:53)
* LINK:
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/QA:SOP_Blocker_Bug_Meeting
(roshi, 16:08:55)
* The bugs up for review today are available at: (roshi, 16:08:58)
* LINK:
http://qa.fedoraproject.org/blockerbugs/current (roshi,
16:09:00)
* The criteria for release blocking bugs can be found at: (roshi,
16:09:03)
* LINK:
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Fedora_22_Alpha_Release_Criteria
(roshi, 16:09:05)
* LINK:
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Fedora_22_Beta_Release_Criteria
(roshi, 16:09:08)
* LINK:
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Fedora_22_Final_Release_Criteria
(roshi, 16:09:11)
* (1166598) going back to installation destination picker swaps
partitions on disks (roshi, 16:09:36)
* LINK:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1166598 (roshi,
16:09:39)
* Proposed Blocker, anaconda, ASSIGNED (roshi, 16:09:42)
* LINK:
http://meetbot.fedoraproject.org/fedora-blocker-review/2015-01-07/f22-blo...
(roshi, 16:13:02)
* AGREED: - 1166598 - AcceptedBlocker - This bug violates the beta
criterion "Complete an installation using any combination of disk
configuration options it allows the user to select" in the case you
change your mind (roshi, 16:30:40)
* (1179905) [dnf] select default optional addons when changing
environments (roshi, 16:32:46)
* LINK:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1179905 (roshi,
16:32:49)
* Proposed Blocker, anaconda, MODIFIED (roshi, 16:32:52)
* AGREED: - 1179905 - RejectedBlocker - This bug doesn't violate any
criterion we have currently and none of the release blocking package
sets use default option groups.
* (1180706) Does not launch: "Gjs-CRITICAL **: Attempting to call back
into JSAPI during the sweeping phase of GC." (adamw, 16:46:29)
* AGREED: - 1180706 - AcceptedBlocker - This bug is a clear violation
of the Final criterion: "All applications that can be launched using
the standard graphical mechanism of a release-blocking desktop after
a default installation of that desktop must start successfully and
withstand a basic functionality test." (adamw, 16:46:39)
* Open Floor (adamw, 16:46:47)
Meeting ended at 16:48:30 UTC.
Action Items
------------
Action Items, by person
-----------------------
* **UNASSIGNED**
* (none)
People Present (lines said)
---------------------------
* roshi (70)
* adamw (35)
* kparal (24)
* brunowolff (5)
* zodbot (4)
* pschindl_wifi (3)
* jsmith (3)
* sgallagh (2)
* satellit (2)
* satellit_e (1)
Generated by `MeetBot`_ 0.1.4 - Edited by Roshi 0.1.4
.. _`MeetBot`:
http://wiki.debian.org/MeetBot
--
// Mike
--
Fedora QA
freenode: roshi
http://roshi.fedorapeople.org