==========================================
#fedora-blocker-review: F24-blocker-review
==========================================
Meeting started by adamw at 16:00:10 UTC. The full logs are available at
https://meetbot.fedoraproject.org/fedora-blocker-review/2016-03-29/f24-bl...
.
Meeting summary
---------------
* Roll Call (adamw, 16:00:10)
* Introduction (adamw, 16:03:10)
* Our purpose in this meeting is to review proposed blocker and
nice-to-have bugs and decide whether to accept them, and to monitor
the progress of fixing existing accepted blocker and nice-to-have
bugs. (adamw, 16:03:10)
* We'll be following the process outlined at: (adamw, 16:03:11)
* LINK:
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/QA:SOP_Blocker_Bug_Meeting
(adamw, 16:03:11)
* The bugs up for review today are available at: (adamw, 16:03:13)
* LINK:
http://qa.fedoraproject.org/blockerbugs/current (adamw,
16:03:15)
* The criteria for release blocking bugs can be found at: (adamw,
16:03:17)
* LINK:
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Fedora_24_Alpha_Release_Criteria
(adamw, 16:03:21)
* LINK:
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Fedora_24_Beta_Release_Criteria
(adamw, 16:03:23)
* LINK:
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Fedora_24_Final_Release_Criteria
(adamw, 16:03:25)
* kparal to secretarialize, thanks kparal (adamw, 16:06:39)
* (1315494) C.UTF-8 doesn't actually work as a default locale (adamw,
16:07:07)
* LINK:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1315494 (adamw,
16:07:07)
* Proposed Blocker, anaconda, MODIFIED (adamw, 16:07:07)
* AGREED: 1315494 - AcceptedBlocker (Beta) - this clearly violates the
criteria (installer fails to run at all) and it's unlikely we can
make the Beta release with the same anaconda build we used for Alpha
(which did not suffer from the bug) (adamw, 16:11:54)
* (1318067) [anaconda] non-bootable system after fresh install of
current F24 on bare metal (adamw, 16:12:01)
* LINK:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1318067 (adamw,
16:12:01)
* Proposed Blocker, grub2, NEW (adamw, 16:12:01)
* AGREED: 1318067 - punt (delay decision) - we're generally inclined
to take this as a Beta or Final blocker, but we'd like to try and
gather some more precise data to be sure how wide the impact is
first (adamw, 16:20:10)
* (1321330) on i.mx6 systems the console does not start correctly
(adamw, 16:20:15)
* LINK:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1321330 (adamw,
16:20:15)
* Proposed Blocker, kernel, NEW (adamw, 16:20:16)
* LINK:
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Architectures/ARM/Supported_Platforms
lists only Fedora 21 and older :) (kparal, 16:25:45)
* AGREED: 1321330 - AcceptedBlocker (Beta) - violates Alpha criterion
"All release-blocking images must boot in their supported
configurations" on several supported ARM platforms (see "Supported
ARM platforms" footnote) (adamw, 16:31:07)
* (1262556) AttributeError: 'NoneType' object has no attribute
'get_data' (adamw, 16:32:34)
* LINK:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1262556 (adamw,
16:32:34)
* Proposed Blocker, NetworkManager, NEW (adamw, 16:32:35)
* AGREED: 1262556 - AcceptedBlocker (Beta) - testing indicates that
this bug violates "When using a dedicated installer image, the
installer must be able to complete an installation using the text,
graphical and VNC installation interfaces." (and other 'complete an
install' criteria) for at least some affected systems, likely
wifi-only installs from netinst / DVD (adamw, 16:41:48)
* (1320395) No 'favorites' in F24 KDE menu (adamw, 16:41:59)
* LINK:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1320395 (adamw,
16:41:59)
* Proposed Blocker, plasma-desktop, ON_QA (adamw, 16:41:59)
* AGREED: 1320395 - RejectedBlocker (Beta), AcceptedBlocker (Final) -
we agreed this isn't really severe enough to constitute "entirely
non-functional" (the Beta wording) but does violate the Final
criterion "All elements of the default panel (or equivalent)
configuration in all release-blocking desktops must function
correctly in typical use." (adamw, 16:54:03)
* that's all for Beta, moving onto Final (adamw, 16:54:38)
* (1320396) [abrt] gnome-software: magazine_chain_pop_head():
gnome-software killed by SIGSEGV (adamw, 16:54:43)
* LINK:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1320396 (adamw,
16:54:43)
* Proposed Blocker, gnome-software, NEW (adamw, 16:54:43)
* AGREED: 1320396 - AcceptedBlocker (Final) - this appears to violate
"Release-blocking desktops must notify the user of available
updates, but must not do so when running as a live image." (adamw,
17:00:33)
* (1320666) Show correct Fedora 24 background in KDE (adamw, 17:00:42)
* LINK:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1320666 (adamw,
17:00:43)
* Proposed Blocker, kde-settings, ASSIGNED (adamw, 17:00:43)
* AGREED: 1320666 - AcceptedBlocker (Final) - clear violation of "The
proposed final Fedora artwork must be included and used as the
background on release-blocking desktops." (adamw, 17:09:33)
* (1314637) SELinux is preventing fwupd from 'write' accesses on the
directory 0000:00:02.0. (adamw, 17:09:43)
* LINK:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1314637 (adamw,
17:09:43)
* Proposed Blocker, selinux-policy, MODIFIED (adamw, 17:09:44)
* AGREED: 1314637 - AcceptedBlocker (Final) - violates "There must be
no SELinux denial notifications or crash notifications on boot of or
during installation from a release-blocking live image, or at first
login after a default install of a release-blocking desktop." It's
not clear whether this is at all hardware-dependent, but even if it
is, it's clear many people are hitting it, enough to take it as a
blocker (adamw, 17:15:55)
* (1316514) SELinux is preventing colord from 'read' accesses on the
file /etc/udev/hwdb.bin. (adamw, 17:18:34)
* LINK:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1316514 (adamw,
17:18:34)
* Proposed Blocker, selinux-policy, MODIFIED (adamw, 17:18:34)
* AGREED: 1316514 - AcceptedBlocker (Final) - clear violation of
"There must be no SELinux denial notifications or crash
notifications on boot of or during installation from a
release-blocking live image, or at first login after a default
install of a release-blocking desktop." (adamw, 17:22:39)
* (1318045) Incorrect keymap when decrypting encrypted partitions
(adamw, 17:23:03)
* LINK:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1318045 (adamw,
17:23:04)
* Proposed Blocker, systemd, NEW (adamw, 17:23:04)
* LINK:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=681250
(pschindl, 17:28:23)
* AGREED: 1318045 - AcceptedBlocker (Final) - as described, this is a
clear violation of "If a particular keyboard layout has been
configured for the system, that keyboard layout must be used: ...
When unlocking encrypted storage volumes during boot" (adamw,
17:37:21)
Meeting ended at 17:42:21 UTC.
Action Items
------------
Action Items, by person
-----------------------
* **UNASSIGNED**
* (none)
People Present (lines said)
---------------------------
* adamw (185)
* kparal (53)
* RaphGro (39)
* danofsatx (28)
* jkurik (22)
* pwhalen (21)
* garretraziel (21)
* pschindl (21)
* lbrabec (12)
* satellit_e (10)
* dgilmore (9)
* zodbot (8)
* kparal2 (3)
* lupinix (1)
Generated by `MeetBot`_ 0.1.4
.. _`MeetBot`:
http://wiki.debian.org/MeetBot
https://meetbot.fedoraproject.org/fedora-blocker-review/2016-03-29/f24-bl...
--
You received this message due to your preference settings at
https://apps.fedoraproject.org/notifications/fmnmeetingminutes.id.fedorap...